Stefan de Folter
- Plant Science top 0.1%
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Pollution top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gerco C. AngenentNayelli Marsch‐MartínezRichard G. H. ImminkLucia ColomboRicardo A. Chávez MontesMartin M. KaterVíctor M. Zúñiga‐MayoBrendan Davies
- Topics
- Plant Molecular Biology Research (96 papers)Plant Reproductive Biology (70 papers)Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (30 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNature CommunicationsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- MexicoNetherlandsItaly
In The Last Decade
Stefan de Folter
123 papers receiving 6.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Plant Science 5.6k
- Molecular Biology 4.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 341
- Pollution 201
- Genetics 197
Countries citing papers authored by Stefan de Folter
This map shows the geographic impact of Stefan de Folter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefan de Folter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefan de Folter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stefan de Folter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefan de Folter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefan de Folter. The network helps show where Stefan de Folter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefan de Folter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefan de Folter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefan de Folter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stefan de Folter. Stefan de Folter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 106 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 76 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | Critical aspects on the integral management of mango: flowering, anthracnosis and industrial waste | 2 |
| 17 | Puntos críticos en el manejo integral de mango: floración, antracnosis y residuos industriales | 5 |
| 18 | 471 | |
| 19 | 288 | |
| 20 | Molecular and Phylogenetic Analyses of the Complete MADS-Box Transcription Factor Family in Arabidopsisbreakdown → | 718 |
About Stefan de Folter
Stefan de Folter is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Horticulture, having authored 129 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (96 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (70 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (5.6k citations), Horticulture (66 citations) and Molecular Biology (4.5k citations). Stefan de Folter has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, Netherlands and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Gerco C. Angenent, Nayelli Marsch‐Martínez, Richard G. H. Immink, Lucia Colombo, Ricardo A. Chávez Montes, Martin M. Kater, Víctor M. Zúñiga‐Mayo, Brendan Davies, Lucie Pařenicová and Martin Kieffer. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.