Thomas Mindos

825 citations
9 papers · 536 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Mindos

9 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Thomas Mindos
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Developmental Neuroscience 144
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 344
  • Rehabilitation 42
  • Neurology 91
  • Cell Biology 63
Replace Jose A. Gomez‐Sanchez with:
Jose A. Gomez‐Sanchez Spain
Yoon Kyung Shin South Korea
Ki H. United States
M. R�ytt� Finland
Le Tian China
Jennifer Dolkas United States
Stefan Fischer Germany
Kumiko Omura Japan
Ashley L. Kalinski United States
Tomokazu Sawada Japan
Thomas Mindos relative to Jose A. Gomez‐Sanchez Spain Jose A. Gomez‐Sanchez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Jose A. Gomez‐Sanchez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Mindos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Mindos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Mindos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Mindos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Mindos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Mindos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Mindos. The network helps show where Thomas Mindos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Mindos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Mindos Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Mindos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2012118
2 2018110
3 201784
4 201776
5 201371
6 201653
7 201621
8 20172
9
The importance of nerve microenvironment for schwannoma development
20161

About Thomas Mindos

Thomas Mindos is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Neurology, Molecular Biology and Rehabilitation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (6 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (2 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (2 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (2 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (1 paper) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (144 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (344 citations), Rehabilitation (42 citations), Neurology (91 citations) and Cell Biology (63 citations). Thomas Mindos has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David B. Parkinson, Haesun A. Kim, Alexander Schulz, Helen Morrison, Xin‐Peng Dun, Sheridan L. Roberts, Stephan L. Baader, Lars Björn Riecken, Patrice Maurel and Reinhard Bauer. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Cell Biology, Journal of Neuroscience, Acta Neuropathologica, Stem Cells Translational Medicine and Journal of Cell Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact