Thomas Miller
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Immunology top 10%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- James L. KrysanDaniel PietrygaMichael L. MucenskiAnn B. KierClaire M. SchreinerS. Steven PotterSteven H. SwerdlowWilliam J. Scott
- Topics
- Insect behavior and control techniques (7 papers)Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (5 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceHematologyHorticulture
- Journals
- CellRadiologyMedical Physics
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaPakistan
In The Last Decade
Thomas Miller
38 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Molecular Biology 948
- Insect Science 570
- Plant Science 350
- Immunology 288
- Cell Biology 239
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Miller
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Miller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Miller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Miller. The network helps show where Thomas Miller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Miller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Miller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Miller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Miller. Thomas Miller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | Predominant bacteria symbionts in the leafhopper Matsumuratettix hiroglyphicus - the vector of sugarcane white leaf phytoplasma | 7 |
| 5 | Symbiotic Control in agriculture and medicine | 6 |
| 6 | Insect Symbiosis Vol. 2 | 45 |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 163 | |
| 10 | Repeated Dose Skin Irritation Study on Jet Fuels - A Histopathology Study. | 4 |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | A functional c-myb gene is required for normal murine fetal hepatic hematopoiesisbreakdown → | 894 |
| 15 | 38 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 182 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Thomas Miller
Thomas Miller is a scholar working on Horticulture, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect behavior and control techniques (7 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (5 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (570 citations), Hematology (221 citations) and Horticulture (17 citations). Thomas Miller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include James L. Krysan, Daniel Pietryga, Michael L. Mucenski, Ann B. Kier, Claire M. Schreiner, S. Steven Potter, Steven H. Swerdlow, William J. Scott, Michael Goitein and John J. Peloquin. Their work appears in journals such as Cell, Radiology and Medical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.