Thomas Merckx

50 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Merckx
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ecological Modeling 780
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.2k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.2k
  • Ecology 720
  • Global and Planetary Change 461
Replace Mark Parsons with:
Mark Parsons United Kingdom
Roel van Klink Germany
Anna L. Hargreaves Canada
Gregor Kalinkat Germany
Thomas Fartmann Germany
Steven E. Travers United States
William J. Resetarits United States
Caroline M. Tucker United States
Marc S. Botham United Kingdom
Nigel A. D. Bourn United Kingdom
Thomas Merckx relative to Mark Parsons United Kingdom Mark Parsons's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Mark Parsons · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Merckx

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Merckx's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Merckx with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Merckx more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Merckx

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Merckx. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Merckx. The network helps show where Thomas Merckx may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Merckx, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Merckx Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Merckx links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016127
2 2013120
3 2014116
4 2009113
5 2010109
6 200896
7 201495
8 201694
9 201993
10 200393
11 200683
12 201280
13 201878
14 201067
15 200757
16 201257
17 202155
18 201254
19 201151
20 200546

About Thomas Merckx

Thomas Merckx is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (34 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (32 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (23 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (11 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (6 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (3 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (780 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.2k citations), Ecology (720 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (461 citations). Thomas Merckx has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Finland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hans Van Dyck, David W. Macdonald, Philip Riordan, Ruth E. Feber, Aurélien Kaiser, Eleanor M. Slade, Henrique M. Pereira, Nigel A. D. Bourn, Mark Parsons and M. C. Townsend. Their work appears in journals such as Insect Conservation and Diversity, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Animal Behaviour, Journal of Insect Conservation and Functional Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact