Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances
2020697 citationsRoel van Klink, Diana E. Bowler et al.Scienceprofile →
Rewilding complex ecosystems
2019408 citationsAndrea Perino, Henrique M. Pereira et al.Scienceprofile →
Disproportionate declines of formerly abundant species underlie insect loss
202375 citationsRoel van Klink, Diana E. Bowler et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Roel van Klink
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Roel van Klink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roel van Klink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roel van Klink more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roel van Klink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roel van Klink. The network helps show where Roel van Klink may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Roel van Klink
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Roel van Klink.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Roel van Klink based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Roel van Klink. Roel van Klink is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Klink, Roel van, et al.. (2023). Disproportionate declines of formerly abundant species underlie insect loss. Nature. 628(8007). 359–364.75 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Callaghan, Corey T., Luís Borda‐de‐Água, Roel van Klink, Roberto Rozzi, & Henrique M. Pereira. (2023). Unveiling global species abundance distributions. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 7(10). 1600–1609.26 indexed citations
9.
Klink, Roel van, et al.. (2020). Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances. Science. 368(6489). 417–420.697 indexed citations breakdown →
Hallmann, Caspar A., Theo Zeegers, Roel van Klink, et al.. (2018). Analysis of insect monitoring data from De Kaaistoep and Drenthe. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).5 indexed citations
Klink, Roel van, et al.. (2016). De slijkgrascicade Prokelisia marginata: een Amerikaanse spoorcicade in Nederland (Homoptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Delphacidae). Entomologische berichten. 76(6). 218–225.2 indexed citations
19.
Klink, Roel van, et al.. (2015). Effects of livestock grazing of coastal salt marshes on spiders and insects.. Entomologische berichten. 75(5). 188–199.2 indexed citations
20.
Klink, Roel van, et al.. (2012). Kevers en hun potentie voor onderzoek in het terpengebied. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 23(23). 111–118.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.