Ruth E. Feber

3.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
37 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Ruth E. Feber is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth E. Feber has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 22 papers in Ecology and 13 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Ruth E. Feber's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers). Ruth E. Feber is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (22 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers). Ruth E. Feber collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Sweden. Ruth E. Feber's co-authors include David W. Macdonald, Robert J. Fuller, Philip W. Atkinson, J. R. B. Tallowin, E. J. Asteraki, V. K. Brown, Juliet A. Vickery, Thomas Merckx, Juliet A. Vickery and L. G. Firbank and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, BioScience and Journal of Applied Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Ruth E. Feber

37 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

The management of lowland neutral grasslands in Britain: ... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth E. Feber United Kingdom 25 1.4k 1.4k 1.0k 524 427 37 2.7k
Åke Berg Sweden 31 1.3k 0.9× 1.4k 1.1× 930 0.9× 502 1.0× 731 1.7× 67 2.7k
Andrew D. Evans United Kingdom 22 856 0.6× 1.2k 0.9× 613 0.6× 517 1.0× 328 0.8× 32 2.3k
Elizabeth Nichols United States 19 1.6k 1.2× 1.2k 0.9× 878 0.9× 233 0.4× 724 1.7× 31 2.9k
Peter Bichier United States 27 899 0.6× 945 0.7× 1.3k 1.2× 820 1.6× 663 1.6× 51 2.9k
Martha J. Groom United States 23 1.0k 0.7× 990 0.7× 1.0k 1.0× 537 1.0× 461 1.1× 33 2.5k
Johan Ekroos Sweden 31 1.2k 0.9× 874 0.6× 1.3k 1.3× 731 1.4× 998 2.3× 78 3.0k
Daniel S. Karp United States 30 1.3k 0.9× 1.4k 1.0× 1.2k 1.1× 685 1.3× 1.2k 2.9× 78 3.8k
Trond H. Larsen United States 19 1.9k 1.4× 1.4k 1.0× 979 1.0× 231 0.4× 934 2.2× 30 3.2k
J. R. B. Tallowin United Kingdom 18 1.1k 0.8× 1.2k 0.9× 716 0.7× 590 1.1× 345 0.8× 55 2.4k
Allan J. Perkins United Kingdom 14 654 0.5× 900 0.7× 538 0.5× 504 1.0× 236 0.6× 20 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth E. Feber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth E. Feber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth E. Feber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth E. Feber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth E. Feber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth E. Feber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth E. Feber. The network helps show where Ruth E. Feber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth E. Feber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth E. Feber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth E. Feber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth E. Feber. Ruth E. Feber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dickman, Amy, Paul J. Johnson, Michael ’t Sas‐Rolfes, et al.. (2018). Is there an elephant in the room? A response to Batavia et al. Conservation Letters. 12(1). 6 indexed citations
2.
Feber, Ruth E., Paul J. Johnson, James R. Bell, et al.. (2015). Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context. PLoS ONE. 10(8). e0135921–e0135921. 25 indexed citations
3.
Shaw, Rosalind F., Paul J. Johnson, David W. Macdonald, & Ruth E. Feber. (2015). Enhancing the Biodiversity of Ditches in Intensively Managed UK Farmland. PLoS ONE. 10(10). e0138306–e0138306. 24 indexed citations
4.
Merckx, Thomas, Lorenzo Marini, Ruth E. Feber, & David W. Macdonald. (2012). Hedgerow trees and extended‐width field margins enhance macro‐moth diversity: implications for management. Journal of Applied Ecology. 49(6). 1396–1404. 80 indexed citations
5.
Raebel, Eva M., Thomas Merckx, Ruth E. Feber, et al.. (2011). Identifying high‐quality pond habitats for Odonata in lowland England: implications for agri‐environment schemes. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 5(6). 422–432. 51 indexed citations
6.
Merckx, Thomas, Ruth E. Feber, Mark Parsons, et al.. (2010). Habitat preference and mobility of Polia bombycina: are non-tailored agri-environment schemes any good for a rare and localised species?. Journal of Insect Conservation. 14(5). 499–510. 25 indexed citations
7.
Feber, Ruth E., et al.. (2010). Short-term successional change does not predict long-term conservation value of managed arable field margins. Biological Conservation. 143(3). 813–822. 22 indexed citations
8.
Merckx, Thomas, Ruth E. Feber, Nigel A. D. Bourn, et al.. (2010). Shelter benefits less mobile moth species: The field-scale effect of hedgerow trees. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 138(3-4). 147–151. 65 indexed citations
9.
Vickery, Juliet A., Ruth E. Feber, & Robert J. Fuller. (2009). Arable field margins managed for biodiversity conservation: A review of food resource provision for farmland birds. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 133(1-2). 1–13. 211 indexed citations
10.
Chamberlain, Dan, Andrew Joys, Paul J. Johnson, et al.. (2009). Does organic farming benefit farmland birds in winter?. Biology Letters. 6(1). 82–84. 32 indexed citations
11.
Butler, Simon J., D. Brooks, Ruth E. Feber, et al.. (2009). A cross‐taxonomic index for quantifying the health of farmland biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology. 46(6). 1154–1162. 53 indexed citations
12.
Norton, Lisa, Paul J. Johnson, Andrew Joys, et al.. (2008). Consequences of organic and non-organic farming practices for field, farm and landscape complexity. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 129(1-3). 221–227. 121 indexed citations
13.
14.
Norton, Lisa, Robert J. Fuller, Ruth E. Feber, et al.. (2006). The benefits of organic farming for biodiversity. Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture). 3 indexed citations
15.
Bonacic, Cristián, Ruth E. Feber, & David W. Macdonald. (2006). Capture of the vicuña (Vicugna vicugna) for sustainable use: Animal welfare implications. Biological Conservation. 129(4). 543–550. 24 indexed citations
16.
Vickery, Juliet A., J. R. B. Tallowin, Ruth E. Feber, et al.. (2001). The management of lowland neutral grasslands in Britain: effects of agricultural practices on birds and their food resources. Journal of Applied Ecology. 38(3). 647–664. 610 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Williams, R. J., N. D. Boatman, J. M. Holland, et al.. (1999). Weed seed predation in arable field margins by carabid beetles (Carabidae: Coleoptera).. Aspects of applied biology. 54. 211–216. 15 indexed citations
18.
Cobb, Dick, Ruth E. Feber, A. Hopkins, et al.. (1999). Integrating the environmental and economic consequences of converting to organic agriculture: evidence from a case study. Land Use Policy. 16(4). 207–221. 66 indexed citations
19.
Shore, Richard F., et al.. (1997). The impacts of molluscicide pellets on spring and autumn populations of wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 64(3). 211–217. 17 indexed citations
20.
Feber, Ruth E., Henrik G. Smith, & David W. Macdonald. (1996). The Effects on Butterfly Abundance of the Management of Uncropped Edges of Arable Fields. Journal of Applied Ecology. 33(5). 1191–1191. 168 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026