Thomas M. Newpher

1.3k citations
15 papers · 1.0k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas M. Newpher

14 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas M. Newpher
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Cell Biology 465
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 510
  • Biophysics 64
  • Developmental Neuroscience 39
  • Molecular Biology 628
Replace Björn Granseth with:
Björn Granseth Sweden
Arthur P.H. de Jong Netherlands
Torben J. Hausrat Germany
L. Niels Cornelisse Netherlands
Joseph L. Dynes United States
Markus Wölfel United States
Tolga Soykan Germany
Daniel W. Allison United States
Mirko Messa United States
Caroline C. Overly United States
Thomas M. Newpher relative to Björn Granseth Sweden Björn Granseth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Björn Granseth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Newpher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Newpher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Newpher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Newpher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Newpher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Newpher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Newpher. The network helps show where Thomas M. Newpher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Newpher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Newpher Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Newpher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2008282
2 2007211
3 2005145
4 2009103
5 200654
6 200251
7 201043
8 200639
9 201735
10 201023
11 201216
12
Comparing Active Learning to Team-Based Learning in Undergraduate Neuroscience.
20208
13
Class Size and Student Performance in a Team-Based Learning Course.
20216
14 20231
15 20200

About Thomas M. Newpher

Thomas M. Newpher is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Education and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cellular transport and secretion (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (3 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (3 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (2 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (465 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (510 citations), Biophysics (64 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (39 citations) and Molecular Biology (628 citations). Thomas M. Newpher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Ehlers, Sandra K. Lemmon, Robin P. Smith, Vance Lemmon, Jiuyi Lü, Bence Rácz, Thomas A. Blanpied, Richard J. Weinberg, Thomas D. Helton and Maribel Geli. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Biology of the Cell, Neuron, Traffic, The EMBO Journal and Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact