Mary Stegmaier

3.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
50 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Mary Stegmaier is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Stegmaier has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 16 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mary Stegmaier's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (36 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (12 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (9 papers). Mary Stegmaier is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (36 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (12 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (9 papers). Mary Stegmaier collaborates with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Germany. Mary Stegmaier's co-authors include Michael S. Lewis‐Beck, Kamil Marcinkiewicz, Jale Tosun, Marc Debus, Christine Fauvelle‐Aymar, Barbara Palmer, Laron Williams, Andreas Murr, Leslie E. Anderson and Kaat Smets and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Forecasting, Annual Review of Political Science and British Journal of Political Science.

In The Last Decade

Mary Stegmaier

45 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Economic Determinants of ... 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 2013 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Stegmaier United States 18 1.6k 650 636 336 209 50 2.0k
Guy D. Whitten United States 19 2.2k 1.3× 941 1.4× 663 1.0× 531 1.6× 176 0.8× 55 2.6k
Randolph T. Stevenson United States 21 2.0k 1.2× 802 1.2× 677 1.1× 620 1.8× 254 1.2× 37 2.5k
Matthew Lebo United States 18 899 0.5× 411 0.6× 464 0.7× 268 0.8× 152 0.7× 38 1.3k
Thomas M. Holbrook United States 21 1.4k 0.8× 525 0.8× 713 1.1× 353 1.1× 487 2.3× 55 1.8k
Brian F. Crisp United States 20 1.7k 1.0× 323 0.5× 610 1.0× 334 1.0× 156 0.7× 52 2.0k
Judith Bara United Kingdom 12 2.4k 1.4× 354 0.5× 607 1.0× 838 2.5× 275 1.3× 21 2.7k
Andrea Volkens Germany 8 2.2k 1.4× 339 0.5× 564 0.9× 822 2.4× 259 1.2× 15 2.6k
Andrew B. Hall United States 18 871 0.5× 323 0.5× 452 0.7× 355 1.1× 92 0.4× 48 1.2k
Samuel Kernell United States 16 1.9k 1.2× 795 1.2× 694 1.1× 499 1.5× 378 1.8× 49 2.3k
Brandice Canes‐Wrone United States 21 1.7k 1.0× 897 1.4× 595 0.9× 687 2.0× 237 1.1× 37 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Stegmaier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Stegmaier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Stegmaier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Stegmaier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Stegmaier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Stegmaier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Stegmaier. The network helps show where Mary Stegmaier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Stegmaier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Stegmaier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Stegmaier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Stegmaier. Mary Stegmaier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lewis‐Beck, Michael S., et al.. (2025). Election forecasting: Political economy models. International Journal of Forecasting. 41(4). 1655–1665.
2.
Marcinkiewicz, Kamil & Mary Stegmaier. (2025). Predicting Support for the Christian Democrats in the 2025 German Bundestag Election: A State-Level Approach. PS Political Science & Politics. 59(1). 55–60.
3.
Stegmaier, Mary, et al.. (2023). The evolution of election forecasting models in the UK. Electoral Studies. 86. 102694–102694. 2 indexed citations
4.
Stegmaier, Mary, Lukáš Linek, & Kamil Marcinkiewicz. (2023). Heterogeneity in the effects of resources, proximity, and identity on preference voting in PR systems. East European Politics. 40(2). 239–255. 1 indexed citations
5.
Stegmaier, Mary & Charles Tien. (2022). Ask a Political Scientist: A Conversation with Michael S. Lewis-Beck about Vote Choice, Election Forecasting, and the 2022 Midterms. Polity. 54(4). 898–909. 1 indexed citations
6.
Palmer, Barbara, et al.. (2020). Revisiting the Presence of Women in Political Science Journal Editorial Positions. PS Political Science & Politics. 53(3). 499–504. 4 indexed citations
7.
Potochnick, Stephanie & Mary Stegmaier. (2020). Latino Political Participation by Citizenship Status and Immigrant Generation. Social Science Quarterly. 101(2). 527–544. 9 indexed citations
9.
Murr, Andreas, Mary Stegmaier, & Michael S. Lewis‐Beck. (2019). Vote Expectations Versus Vote Intentions: Rival Forecasting Strategies. British Journal of Political Science. 51(1). 60–67. 16 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Laron, Mary Stegmaier, & Marc Debus. (2015). Relaxing the Constant Economic Vote Restriction. Party Politics. 23(3). 286–296. 25 indexed citations
11.
Lewis‐Beck, Michael S. & Mary Stegmaier. (2014). US Presidential Election Forecasting. PS Political Science & Politics. 47(2). 284–288. 33 indexed citations
12.
Schmidt, Patrick & Mary Stegmaier. (2014). The 2014 presidential and early parliamentary elections in Macedonia. Electoral Studies. 36. 210–213. 5 indexed citations
13.
Lewis‐Beck, Michael S. & Mary Stegmaier. (2014). To improve their predictions, election forecasters should look to other disciplines like meteorology. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations
14.
Stegmaier, Mary, Michael S. Lewis‐Beck, & Kaat Smets. (2012). Standing for Parliament: Do Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Candidates Pay Extra?. Parliamentary Affairs. 66(2). 268–285. 17 indexed citations
15.
Stegmaier, Mary, et al.. (2011). Getting on the Board: The Presence of Women in Political Science Journal Editorial Positions. PS Political Science & Politics. 44(4). 799–804. 46 indexed citations
16.
Lewis‐Beck, Michael S. & Mary Stegmaier. (2010). Citizen forecasting: Can UK voters see the future?. Electoral Studies. 30(2). 264–268. 38 indexed citations
17.
Stegmaier, Mary & Michael S. Lewis‐Beck. (2010). Shocks and oscillations: The political economy of Hungary. Electoral Studies. 30(3). 462–467. 7 indexed citations
18.
Lewis‐Beck, Michael S. & Mary Stegmaier. (2008). Economic Voting in Transitional Democracies. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 18(3). 12 indexed citations
19.
Stegmaier, Mary, et al.. (2001). A Comparison of National Effects on Individual U.S. Senate Elections. Politics & Policy. 29(3). 545–567.
20.
Lewis‐Beck, Michael S. & Mary Stegmaier. (2000). Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science. 3(1). 183–219. 999 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026