Thomas M. Dixon
- Epidemiology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Roy F. BaumeisterLyn S. TurkstraLance L. GoetzLisa OttomanelliScott D. BarnettSally Ann HolmesFlorian P. ThomasPatricia L. Sinnott
- Topics
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers)Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (3 papers)Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers)
- Journals
- Personality and Social Psychology BulletinArchives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Thomas M. Dixon
14 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Epidemiology 76
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 70
- Psychiatry and Mental health 70
- Social Psychology 65
- Clinical Psychology 55
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Dixon. The network helps show where Thomas M. Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Dixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Dixon. Thomas M. Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 76 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 65 | |
| 14 | 80 |
About Thomas M. Dixon
Thomas M. Dixon is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Biological Psychiatry and Emergency Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 328 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (3 papers) and Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (28 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (70 citations) and Occupational Therapy (17 citations). Thomas M. Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Roy F. Baumeister, Lyn S. Turkstra, Lance L. Goetz, Lisa Ottomanelli, Scott D. Barnett, Sally Ann Holmes, Florian P. Thomas, Patricia L. Sinnott, Alina Surís and Daisha J. Cipher. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.