Thomas M. Chappell

701 total citations
36 papers, 465 citations indexed

About

Thomas M. Chappell is a scholar working on Plant Science, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas M. Chappell has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 465 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Plant Science, 17 papers in Insect Science and 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Thomas M. Chappell's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (12 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (7 papers). Thomas M. Chappell is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (12 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers) and Plant Virus Research Studies (7 papers). Thomas M. Chappell collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Thomas M. Chappell's co-authors include George G. Kennedy, Martha A. Mutschler, André Keßler, Anders S. Huseth, Roger D. Magarey, Alana L. Jacobson, Darlene M. De Jong, Mark D. Rausher, Christina M Trexler and Ernie F. Hain and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Environmental Science & Technology and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Thomas M. Chappell

32 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Thomas M. Chappell
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Plant Science 280
  • Insect Science 241
  • Molecular Biology 110
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 58
  • Genetics 36
Replace Shouke Zhang with:
Shouke Zhang China
Aleksandra Adomas Sweden
Dun‐Chun He China
Hilary A. Sandler United States
Haikun Ma China
P. Dugger
Yujun Wang China
Cyro Paulino da Costa Brazil
Shouke Zhang China View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Thomas M. Chappell
Thomas M. Chappell · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Thomas M. Chappell
Thomas M. Chappell · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Chappell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Chappell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Chappell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Chappell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Chappell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Chappell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Chappell. The network helps show where Thomas M. Chappell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Chappell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Chappell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Chappell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Chappell. Thomas M. Chappell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 3
4 15
5 1
6 0
7 3
8 2
9 8
10 17
11 11
12 27
13 3
14 68
15 27
16 6
17 13
18 1
19 2
20 9

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026