Thomas L. Williams
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Physiology top 2%
- Biomaterials top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Louise C. SerpellA. Toby A. JenkinsBrigita UrbancKyle L. MorrisIain J. DayLeila F. DeraviJulian R. ThorpeHans J. Ache
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers)Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (10 papers)Calibration and Measurement Techniques (10 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological ChemistryAngewandte Chemie International Edition
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Williams
51 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Molecular Biology 839
- Physiology 830
- Biomaterials 281
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 135
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 123
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Williams. The network helps show where Thomas L. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas L. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas L. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas L. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas L. Williams. Thomas L. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 137 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 158 | |
| 12 | 202 | |
| 13 | 293 | |
| 14 | 77 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | A portable MRTD collimator system for fast in-situ testing of FLIR’s and other thermal imagers. | 0 |
| 18 | Software protocols smooth the path to a standard graphics interface. | 2 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Thomas L. Williams
Thomas L. Williams is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Physiology and Biomaterials, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (10 papers) and Calibration and Measurement Techniques (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (830 citations), Biomaterials (281 citations) and Molecular Biology (839 citations). Thomas L. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Louise C. Serpell, A. Toby A. Jenkins, Brigita Urbanc, Kyle L. Morris, Iain J. Day, Leila F. Deravi, Julian R. Thorpe, Hans J. Ache, Frédéric Rousseau and Annelies Vandersteen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.