André Gallois
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 7
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 1
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 1
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 8
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 3
- Philosophy and History of Science 2
-
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 1
- Journals
- Mind (4 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
André Gallois
20 papers receiving 182 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Philosophy 154
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
- History and Philosophy of Science 50
- Cognitive Neuroscience 74
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
Countries citing papers authored by André Gallois
This map shows the geographic impact of André Gallois's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by André Gallois with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites André Gallois more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by André Gallois
This network shows the impact of papers produced by André Gallois. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by André Gallois. The network helps show where André Gallois may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside André Gallois, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 4 | How Things Might Have Been: Individuals, Kinds, and Essential Properties | 2006 | 7 |
| 5 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2000 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 59 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1979 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 13 |
About André Gallois
André Gallois is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Religious studies and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 22 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (1 paper), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (154 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (50 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (74 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). André Gallois has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brie Gertler, Peter van Inwagen, Alan Sidelle and Robert Elliot. Their work appears in journals such as Mind, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.