Thomas Kötter

1.3k citations
35 papers · 803 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Kötter

32 papers receiving 777 citations

Peers

Thomas Kötter
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • General Health Professions 336
  • Family Practice 23
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 278
  • Gastroenterology 51
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 119
Replace J. Harry Isaacson with:
J. Harry Isaacson United States
Jan Lecouturier United Kingdom
Richard C. Antonelli United States
Ann Maguire Australia
Elisabeth Spichiger Switzerland
Katherine Ferrier New Zealand
David J Evans United Kingdom
Robert J. Fortuna United States
Juan Manuel Carmona‐Torres Spain
Andrea Nevedal United States
Thomas Kötter relative to J. Harry Isaacson United States J. Harry Isaacson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
J. Harry Isaacson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kötter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kötter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kötter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kötter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kötter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kötter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kötter. The network helps show where Thomas Kötter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kötter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kötter Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kötter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20240
4 20242
5 20232
6 20231
7 20230
8 202142
9 202170
10 20202
11 20204
12 202018
13 201914
14 201892
15 201622
16 20169
17 201633
18 201536
19 201338
20 201023

About Thomas Kötter

Thomas Kötter is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Family Practice and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 35 papers that have together received 803 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (13 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (10 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (6 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers) and Health and Well-being Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (336 citations), Family Practice (23 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (278 citations), Gastroenterology (51 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (119 citations). Thomas Kötter has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Martin Scherer, Eva Blozik, Edgar Voltmer, Nadine Janis Pohontsch, Katrin Obst, Anne Stark, Stephan Reichenbach, Bruno R. da Costa, Margrit Fässler and Klaus Linde. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Education, PLoS ONE, Patient Preference and Adherence, Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability and Medical Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026