Margrit Fässler

1.1k total citations
18 papers, 797 citations indexed

About

Margrit Fässler is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Complementary and alternative medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Margrit Fässler has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 797 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine and 9 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Margrit Fässler's work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (11 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (8 papers). Margrit Fässler is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Placebo Effect (11 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (11 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (8 papers). Margrit Fässler collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Netherlands. Margrit Fässler's co-authors include Klaus Linde, Karin Meißner, Antonius Schneider, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Jos Kleijnen, Thomas Rosemann, Nikola Biller‐Andorno, Gerta Rücker, Gerd Antes and Markus Gnädinger and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Margrit Fässler

15 papers receiving 766 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Margrit Fässler Switzerland 11 488 326 299 82 80 18 797
Arya Nielsen United States 14 212 0.4× 137 0.4× 402 1.3× 67 0.8× 82 1.0× 48 797
Victoria Hadhazy United States 9 318 0.7× 304 0.9× 608 2.0× 79 1.0× 24 0.3× 12 1.1k
Jorge Vas Spain 17 211 0.4× 138 0.4× 749 2.5× 55 0.7× 69 0.9× 43 1.1k
Robert Harland United Kingdom 7 71 0.1× 133 0.4× 238 0.8× 30 0.4× 16 0.2× 17 688
Ka-Kit Hui United States 11 60 0.1× 114 0.3× 268 0.9× 36 0.4× 26 0.3× 36 589
Morten Steen Hansen Denmark 17 56 0.1× 509 1.6× 45 0.2× 65 0.8× 38 0.5× 28 966
P. Lalonde Canada 10 73 0.1× 252 0.8× 29 0.1× 67 0.8× 35 0.4× 22 779
Anthony Campbell United Kingdom 13 165 0.3× 61 0.2× 283 0.9× 90 1.1× 41 0.5× 53 695
Nancy Stephenson United States 9 76 0.2× 66 0.2× 208 0.7× 41 0.5× 80 1.0× 12 487
WU Tai-xiang China 7 409 0.8× 205 0.6× 1.3k 4.4× 105 1.3× 32 0.4× 18 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Margrit Fässler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margrit Fässler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margrit Fässler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margrit Fässler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margrit Fässler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margrit Fässler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margrit Fässler. The network helps show where Margrit Fässler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margrit Fässler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margrit Fässler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margrit Fässler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margrit Fässler. Margrit Fässler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
2.
Fässler, Margrit, Susanne Jöbges, & Nikola Biller‐Andorno. (2020). Bonus agreements of senior physicians in Switzerland – A qualitative interview study. Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen. 158-159. 39–46.
3.
Fässler, Margrit, et al.. (2015). Impact of the DRG-based reimbursement system on patient care and professional practise: perspectives of Swiss hospital physicians. Swiss Medical Weekly. 145(708). w14080–w14080. 30 indexed citations
4.
Wild, Verina, Margrit Fässler, Bernice S. Elger, et al.. (2015). Assessing the impact of DRGs on patient care and professional practice in Switzerland (IDoC) – a potential model for monitoring and evaluating healthcare reform. Swiss Medical Weekly. 145(708). w14034–w14034. 5 indexed citations
5.
Kötter, Thomas, Bruno R. da Costa, Margrit Fässler, et al.. (2015). Metamizole-Associated Adverse Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 10(4). e0122918–e0122918. 110 indexed citations
6.
Tandjung, Ryan, et al.. (2014). The patient’s perspective of placebo use in daily practice: a qualitative study. Swiss Medical Weekly. 144(708). w13899–w13899. 10 indexed citations
7.
Fässler, Margrit, Karin Meißner, Jos Kleijnen, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, & Klaus Linde. (2014). A systematic review found no consistent difference in effect between more and less intensive placebo interventions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 68(4). 442–451. 26 indexed citations
8.
Linde, Klaus, et al.. (2013). Use of Placebos and Nonspecific and Complementary Treatments by German Physicians - Rationale and Development of a Questionnaire for a Nationwide Survey. Complementary Medicine Research. 20(5). 361–367. 8 indexed citations
9.
Meißner, Karin, Margrit Fässler, Gerta Rücker, et al.. (2013). Differential Effectiveness of Placebo Treatments. JAMA Internal Medicine. 173(21). 1941–1941. 213 indexed citations
10.
Meißner, Karin, et al.. (2011). Widespread use of pure and impure placebo interventions by GPs in Germany. Family Practice. 29(1). 79–85. 53 indexed citations
11.
Rosemann, Thomas, et al.. (2011). The use of pure and impure placebo interventions in primary care - a qualitative approach. BMC Family Practice. 12(1). 11–11. 32 indexed citations
12.
Fässler, Margrit, Markus Gnädinger, Thomas Rosemann, & Nikola Biller‐Andorno. (2011). Placebo interventions in practice: a questionnaire survey on the attitudes of patients and physicians. British Journal of General Practice. 61(583). 101–107. 36 indexed citations
13.
Gnädinger, Markus & Margrit Fässler. (2011). Placebo in der ärztlichen Praxis. 33(4).
14.
Linde, Klaus, Margrit Fässler, & Karin Meißner. (2011). Placebo interventions, placebo effects and clinical practice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 366(1572). 1905–1912. 69 indexed citations
15.
Fässler, Margrit, Karin Meißner, Antonius Schneider, & Klaus Linde. (2010). Frequency and circumstances of placebo use in clinical practice - a systematic review of empirical studies. BMC Medicine. 8(1). 15–15. 144 indexed citations
16.
Fässler, Margrit, Markus Gnädinger, Thomas Rosemann, & Nikola Biller‐Andorno. (2009). Use of placebo interventions among Swiss primary care providers. BMC Health Services Research. 9(1). 144–144. 56 indexed citations
17.
Fässler, Margrit, et al.. (2007). Can there be exceptions to fully informed consent in randomized clinical trials? The case of the randomized consent (Zelen) design. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 15. 352–389. 1 indexed citations
18.
Porzsolt, Franz, et al.. (2005). Validity of original studies in health technology assessment reports: Significance of standardized assessment and reporting. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 21(3). 410–413. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026