Thomas Köhler
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 2%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ralph MüllerAmparo NáveaSandra MoralesValery NaranjoJosé M. MossiAndres Diaz‐PintoJoachim HorneggerRoland Proksa
- Topics
- Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (19 papers)Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (18 papers)Radiation Dose and Imaging (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyFinlandSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Thomas Köhler
53 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 786
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 468
- Biomedical Engineering 450
- Molecular Biology 426
- Ophthalmology 309
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Köhler
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Köhler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Köhler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Köhler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Köhler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Köhler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Köhler. The network helps show where Thomas Köhler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Köhler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Köhler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Köhler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Köhler. Thomas Köhler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validationbreakdown → | 289 |
| 2 | 53 | |
| 3 | 42 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 119 | |
| 6 | Instrument segmentation in hybrid 3-D endoscopy using multi-sensor super-resolution. | 1 |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | A Preprocessing Framework for Low-Cost Retinal Fundus Images | 0 |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 184 |
About Thomas Köhler
Thomas Köhler is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Radiation and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (19 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (18 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (786 citations), Ophthalmology (309 citations) and Radiation (219 citations). Thomas Köhler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Ralph Müller, Amparo Návea, Sandra Morales, Valery Naranjo, José M. Mossi, Andres Diaz‐Pinto, Joachim Hornegger, Roland Proksa, Allison R. Pettit and David Hume. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.