Claas Bontus

724 total citations
27 papers, 535 citations indexed

About

Claas Bontus is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Claas Bontus has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 535 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 17 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 8 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Claas Bontus's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (11 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (10 papers). Claas Bontus is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (14 papers), Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (11 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (10 papers). Claas Bontus collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Netherlands. Claas Bontus's co-authors include Bernhard Gleich, Jürgen Rahmer, Thomas Köhler, Roland Proksa, Jörn Borgert, J. Schmidt, Ingo Schmale, O. Woywode, B. David and Peter Koken and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Physics in Medicine and Biology and Medical Physics.

In The Last Decade

Claas Bontus

27 papers receiving 518 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Claas Bontus Germany	13	468	231	227	48	48	27	535
Anna C. Bakenecker Germany	12	266 0.6×	39 0.2×	94 0.4×	24 0.5×	75 1.6×	24	407
Robert L. Duschka Germany	7	397 0.8×	41 0.2×	238 1.0×	54 1.1×	3 0.1×	18	444
Hanne Wojtczyk Germany	7	304 0.6×	51 0.2×	224 1.0×	49 1.0×	3 0.1×	19	348
Martin Möddel Germany	13	662 1.4×	34 0.1×	480 2.1×	90 1.9×	5 0.1×	38	721
Christian Kaethner Germany	9	381 0.8×	21 0.1×	263 1.2×	48 1.0×	4 0.1×	22	447
Mandy Ahlborg Germany	11	436 0.9×	27 0.1×	297 1.3×	67 1.4×	3 0.1×	32	512
Pulak Nath United States	12	251 0.5×	31 0.1×	51 0.2×	34 0.7×	7 0.1×	26	368
Nadine Gdaniec Germany	12	680 1.5×	49 0.2×	492 2.2×	97 2.0×	2 0.0×	16	751
Samantha Luois United States	4	737 1.6×	216 0.9×	35 0.2×	12 0.3×	8 0.2×	5	783
Timo F. Sattel Germany	16	1.3k 2.8×	39 0.2×	1.1k 4.8×	179 3.7×	9 0.2×	54	1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Claas Bontus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Claas Bontus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claas Bontus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claas Bontus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Claas Bontus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claas Bontus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claas Bontus. The network helps show where Claas Bontus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claas Bontus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claas Bontus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claas Bontus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claas Bontus. Claas Bontus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Rahmer, Jürgen, et al.. (2017). Interactive Magnetic Catheter Steering With 3-D Real-Time Feedback Using Multi-Color Magnetic Particle Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 36(7). 1449–1456. 69 indexed citations

Schmale, Ingo, Bernhard Gleich, Jürgen Rahmer, et al.. (2015). MPI Safety in the View of MRI Safety Standards. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 51(2). 1–4. 34 indexed citations

Duschka, Robert L., Hanne Wojtczyk, Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos, et al.. (2013). Heating of interventional instruments in magnetic particle imaging - First experiences of safety measurements. 1–1. 1 indexed citations

Borgert, Jörn, J. Schmidt, Ingo Schmale, et al.. (2013). Perspectives on clinical magnetic particle imaging. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering. 58(6). 551–6. 46 indexed citations

Rahmer, Jürgen, Bernhard Gleich, J. Weizenecker, et al.. (2013). Fast continuous motion of the field of view in magnetic particle imaging. 1–1. 10 indexed citations

Borgert, Jörn, J. Schmidt, Ingo Schmale, et al.. (2012). Fundamentals and applications of magnetic particle imaging. Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography. 6(3). 149–153. 86 indexed citations

Rahmer, Jürgen, Bernhard Gleich, J. Schmidt, et al.. (2011). Increased volume coverage in 3D magnetic particle imaging. 1–5. 1 indexed citations

Ven, Stephanie M.W.Y. van de, Sjoerd G. Elias, Andrea J. Wiethoff, et al.. (2009). Diffuse optical tomography of the breast: preliminary findings of a new prototype and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. European Radiology. 19(5). 1108–1113. 33 indexed citations

Tolker‐Nielsen, Tim, et al.. (2008). Linear image reconstruction for a diffuse optical mammography system in a noncompressed geometry using scattering fluid. Applied Optics. 48(10). D1–D1. 19 indexed citations

10.

Schirra, Carsten O., Claas Bontus, Udo van Stevendaal, Olaf Dössel, & Michael Graß. (2008). Improvement of cardiac CT reconstruction using local motion vector fields. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics. 33(2). 122–130. 13 indexed citations

11.

Köhler, Thomas, Claas Bontus, & Roland Proksa. (2008). BPF reconstruction for helical CT using all data. 151. 4154–4156. 3 indexed citations

12.

Tolker‐Nielsen, Tim, et al.. (2008). Linear Image Reconstruction for a Diffuse Optical Mammography System in a Non-Compressed Geometry Using Scattering Fluid. Biomedical optics. 4. BMD23–BMD23. 6 indexed citations

13.

Köhler, Thomas, Claas Bontus, & Peter Koken. (2006). The radon-split method for helical cone-beam CT and its application to nongated reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 25(7). 882–897. 16 indexed citations

14.

Bontus, Claas, Peter Koken, Thomas Köhler, & Roland Proksa. (2006). Circular CT in combination with a helical segment. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 52(1). 107–120. 7 indexed citations

15.

Bontus, Claas, Peter Koken, Thomas Köhler, & Michael Graß. (2006). CEnPiT: Helical cardiac CT reconstruction. Medical Physics. 33(8). 2792–2799. 6 indexed citations

16.

Bontus, Claas, Thomas Köhler, & Roland Proksa. (2005). EnPiT: filtered back-projection algorithm for helical CT using an n-Pi acquisition. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 24(8). 977–986. 19 indexed citations

17.

Bontus, Claas, et al.. (2005). PI-partner based motion detection and motion artifact reduction. IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004.. 4. 2520–2524. 1 indexed citations

18.

Köhler, Thomas, Claas Bontus, Kevin Brown, et al.. (2004). Evaluation of helical cone-beam CT reconstruction algorithms. 2002 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 2. 1217–1220. 7 indexed citations

19.

Bontus, Claas, Thomas Köhler, & Roland Proksa. (2003). A quasiexact reconstruction algorithm for helical CT using a 3‐Pi acquisition. Medical Physics. 30(9). 2493–2502. 50 indexed citations

20.

Proksa, Roland, et al.. (2001). Artifact analysis of approximate helical cone‐beam CT reconstruction algorithms. Medical Physics. 29(1). 51–64. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact