Thomas Kaemming

687 total citations
19 papers, 556 citations indexed

About

Thomas Kaemming is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Kaemming has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 556 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 6 papers in Computational Mechanics and 6 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. Recurrent topics in Thomas Kaemming's work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (16 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (7 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (6 papers). Thomas Kaemming is often cited by papers focused on Combustion and Detonation Processes (16 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (7 papers) and Risk and Safety Analysis (6 papers). Thomas Kaemming collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Thomas Kaemming's co-authors include Daniel E. Paxson, John Hoke, Matthew Fotia, Andrew Naples, Frederick R. Schauer, Brent A. Rankin, Christopher Stevens, Scott W. Theuerkauf, Frederick Schauer and Fred Schauer and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Propulsion and Power, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power and 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Kaemming

19 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Kaemming United States 11 548 359 257 207 123 19 556
Supraj Prakash United States 11 393 0.7× 255 0.7× 175 0.7× 184 0.9× 117 1.0× 15 441
И. Д. Мацуков Russia 8 556 1.0× 417 1.2× 205 0.8× 217 1.0× 165 1.3× 12 562
E. Wintenberger United States 10 617 1.1× 331 0.9× 284 1.1× 327 1.6× 90 0.7× 17 625
Ratiba Zitoun France 12 472 0.9× 284 0.8× 197 0.8× 247 1.2× 86 0.7× 25 480
Richard Bluemner Germany 11 382 0.7× 242 0.7× 177 0.7× 163 0.8× 102 0.8× 17 411
Ming-Yi Luan China 11 630 1.1× 464 1.3× 222 0.9× 347 1.7× 147 1.2× 14 634
Andrew Naples United States 13 1.1k 2.1× 781 2.2× 516 2.0× 451 2.2× 271 2.2× 24 1.2k
Kevin Y. Cho United States 10 349 0.6× 236 0.7× 111 0.4× 219 1.1× 119 1.0× 19 441
Qingyang Meng China 12 384 0.7× 297 0.8× 108 0.4× 175 0.8× 124 1.0× 21 396
Soma Nakagami Japan 7 363 0.7× 270 0.8× 138 0.5× 179 0.9× 74 0.6× 11 369

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kaemming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kaemming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kaemming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kaemming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kaemming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kaemming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kaemming. The network helps show where Thomas Kaemming may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Kaemming

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Kaemming. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Kaemming based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Kaemming. Thomas Kaemming is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Kaemming, Thomas, Matthew Fotia, John Hoke, Stephen A. Schumaker, & Frederick R. Schauer. (2020). Quantification of the Loss Mechanisms of a Ram Rotating Detonation Engine. AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. 10 indexed citations
2.
Fotia, Matthew, Thomas Kaemming, Joshua R. Codoni, John Hoke, & Frederick Schauer. (2019). Experimental Thrust Sensitivity of a Rotating Detonation Engine to Various Aerospike Plug-Nozzle Configurations. AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. 15 indexed citations
3.
Kaemming, Thomas & Daniel E. Paxson. (2018). Correction: Determining the Pressure Gain of Pressure Gain Combustion. 2018 Joint Propulsion Conference. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kaemming, Thomas & Daniel E. Paxson. (2018). Determining the Pressure Gain of Pressure Gain Combustion. 2018 Joint Propulsion Conference. 85 indexed citations
5.
Schwer, Douglas, Thomas Kaemming, & K. Kailasanath. (2017). Pressure Feedback in the Diffuser of a Ram-RDE Propulsive Device. 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 10 indexed citations
6.
Kaemming, Thomas, Matthew Fotia, John Hoke, & Frederick Schauer. (2016). Thermodynamic Modeling of a Rotating Detonation Engine Through a Reduced Order Approach. 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 7 indexed citations
7.
Rankin, Brent A., Matthew Fotia, Andrew Naples, et al.. (2016). Overview of Performance, Application, and Analysis of Rotating Detonation Engine Technologies. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 33(1). 131–143. 205 indexed citations
8.
Fotia, Matthew, Thomas Kaemming, John Hoke, & Frederick Schauer. (2015). Study of the Experimental Performance of a Rotating Detonation Engine with Nozzled Exhaust Flow. 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 29 indexed citations
9.
Paxson, Daniel E. & Thomas Kaemming. (2013). The Influence of Unsteadiness on the Analysis of Pressure Gain Combustion Devices. 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 8 indexed citations
10.
Paxson, Daniel E. & Thomas Kaemming. (2012). Foundational Performance Analyses of Pressure Gain Combustion Thermodynamic Benefits for Gas Turbines. 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 45 indexed citations
11.
Naples, Andrew, et al.. (2012). Parametric Testing of a Unique Rotating Detonation Engine Design. 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. 55 indexed citations
12.
Kaemming, Thomas, et al.. (2005). The NASA GRC & AFRL/PR Critical PDE Verification Test. 1 indexed citations
13.
Kaemming, Thomas, et al.. (2004). The Thermodynamic and Fluid Dynamic Functions of a Pulsed Detonation Engine Nozzle. 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. 22 indexed citations
14.
Kaemming, Thomas, et al.. (2003). Reaction Ratio and Nozzle Expansion Effects on the PDE. 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. 11 indexed citations
15.
Kaemming, Thomas, et al.. (2002). Proposed Nomenclature Guide for Pulse Detonation Engines. 7 indexed citations
16.
Kaemming, Thomas, et al.. (2002). The Thermodynamic Basis of Pulsed Detonation Engine Thrust Production. 31 indexed citations
17.
Kaemming, Thomas. (2002). Integrated Vehicle Comparison of Turbo-Ramjet Engine and Pulsed Detonation Engine. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power. 125(1). 257–262. 10 indexed citations
18.
Kaemming, Thomas & Kandler Smith. (1984). Techniques to reduce exhaust gas ingestion for vectored-thrust V/STOVL aircraft. 2 indexed citations
19.
Kaemming, Thomas, et al.. (1972). Propulsion sizing program. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026