Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Schauer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Schauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Schauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Schauer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Schauer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Schauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Schauer. The network helps show where Frederick Schauer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Schauer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Schauer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Schauer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Schauer. Frederick Schauer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schauer, Frederick. (2012). The Permutations of Academic Freedom. 65. 193–201.4 indexed citations
5.
Schauer, Frederick. (2009). When and How (If at All) Does Law Constrain Official Actions. 44. 769–801.3 indexed citations
6.
Schauer, Frederick. (2009). Can Bad Science Be Good Evidence: Lie Detection, Neuroscience, and the Mistaken Conflation of Legal and Scientific Norms. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
7.
Schauer, Frederick. (2009). Institutions and the Concept of Law: A Reply to Ronald Dworkin (with Some Help from Neil MacCormick). SSRN Electronic Journal. 35–44.4 indexed citations
8.
Schauer, Frederick. (2007). Institutions as Legal and Constitutional Categories. UCLA law review. 54. 1747–1766.
9.
Alexander, Larry & Frederick Schauer. (2007). Is Policy within Law's Limited Domain?. 26(2). 221–236.1 indexed citations
10.
Schauer, Frederick. (2004). The Failure of the Common Law. 36. 765–782.3 indexed citations
11.
Alexander, Larry & Frederick Schauer. (2000). Defending Judicial Supremacy: A Reply. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota). 17(3). 455–482.9 indexed citations
12.
Schauer, Frederick. (1999). Discourse and Its Discontents. The Notre Dame law review. 72(5). 1309.5 indexed citations
13.
Schauer, Frederick, et al.. (1999). Rules and reasoning : essays in honour of Fred Schauer. Hart Publishing eBooks.1 indexed citations
14.
Schauer, Frederick. (1998). Principles, Institutions, and the First Amendment. Harvard Law Review. 112(1). 84–120.4 indexed citations
15.
Schauer, Frederick, et al.. (1992). The First amendment : a reader. West Pub. Co. eBooks.3 indexed citations
16.
Schauer, Frederick. (1992). The Practice and Problems of Plain Meaning: A Response to Aleinikoff and Shaw. Vanderbilt law review. 45(3). 715.1 indexed citations
17.
Schauer, Frederick. (1991). Reflections on the Value of Truth. Case Western Reserve law review. 41(3). 699–724.4 indexed citations
18.
Schauer, Frederick. (1990). Mrs. Palsgraf And The First Amendment. Washington and Lee law review. 47(1). 161–170.2 indexed citations
19.
Schauer, Frederick. (1983). Free Speech and the Assumption of Rationality. Vanderbilt law review. 36(1). 199.1 indexed citations
20.
Schauer, Frederick. (1979). Response: Pornography and the First Amendment. University of Pittsburgh Law Review.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.