Frederick Schauer

281 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Frederick Schauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 1.1k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 736
  • Law 853
  • Aerospace Engineering 1.7k
  • Political Science and International Relations 635
Replace Otto Spies with:
Otto Spies
William E. Thompson United States
Thomas Peters Germany
H. L. Armstrong Canada
Vladimir Kogan United States
Craig R. Scott United States
Jason Miller United States
Martin B. Short United States
Gene I. Rochlin United States
Geoff Brumfiel United States
Frederick Schauer relative to Otto Spies Otto Spies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×38.7×
Otto Spies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Schauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Schauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Schauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Schauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Schauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Schauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Schauer. The network helps show where Frederick Schauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick Schauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick Schauer Line = papers co-authored together Frederick Schauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 323 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994150
2
Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry
1982147
3 201484
4 201584
5 201582
6
Fear, Risk and the First Amendment: Unraveling the Chilling Effect
197873
7 200967
8 201265
9 198862
10 201762
11 201862
12 201559
13 201458
14 201557
15 199056
16 200952
17 200552
18 199745
19 201643
20 201641

About Frederick Schauer

Frederick Schauer is a scholar working on Law, Aerospace Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 323 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (86 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (45 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (40 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (38 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (32 papers), Law in Society and Culture (26 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (26 papers) and Energetic Materials and Combustion (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (1.1k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (736 citations), Law (853 citations), Aerospace Engineering (1.7k citations) and Political Science and International Relations (635 citations). Frederick Schauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and U.S. Virgin Islands. Frequent co-authors include John Hoke, Matthew Fotia, William H. Wilcox, Royce Bradley, Andrew Naples, Paul King, Brent A. Rankin, Daniel E. Paxson, Christopher Stevens and Larry Alexander. Their work appears in journals such as The Supreme Court Review, Harvard Law Review, Michigan Law Review, The University of Chicago Law Review and California Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact