Fred Schauer

60 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Fred Schauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 862
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 660
  • Aerospace Engineering 1.4k
  • Mechanics of Materials 571
  • Computational Mechanics 353
Replace D. Desbordes with:
D. Desbordes France
G. Ciccarelli Canada
Matthew Fotia United States
J.H. Lee Canada
Matei I. Radulescu Canada
Frederick R. Schauer United States
R. Knystautas Canada
Andrew Naples United States
G. D. Roy United States
Nobuyuki Tsuboi Japan
Fred Schauer relative to D. Desbordes France D. Desbordes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
D. Desbordes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Schauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Schauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Schauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Schauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Schauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Schauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Schauer. The network helps show where Fred Schauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fred Schauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Schauer Line = papers co-authored together Fred Schauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015171
2 2001167
3 201771
4 201271
5 201363
6 201761
7 201460
8
Detonation Initiation Studies and Performance Results for Pulsed Detonation Engine
200158
9 201255
10 201746
11 201445
12 200232
13 201131
14 201831
15 201431
16 199630
17 201130
18 201328
19 201227
20 201326

About Fred Schauer

Fred Schauer is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Mechanics of Materials and Computational Mechanics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (54 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (31 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (27 papers), Energetic Materials and Combustion (17 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (9 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (4 papers) and Heat transfer and supercritical fluids (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (862 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (660 citations), Aerospace Engineering (1.4k citations), Mechanics of Materials (571 citations) and Computational Mechanics (353 citations). Fred Schauer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Hoke, Matthew Fotia, Royce Bradley, Paul King, Andrew Naples, Christopher Stevens, Ephraim Gutmark, Brent A. Rankin, Marc D. Polanka and Thomas Kaemming. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Propulsion and Power, Combustion Science and Technology, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Experiments in Fluids and BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact