Thomas K. Hubbard

1.1k total citations
43 papers, 211 citations indexed

About

Thomas K. Hubbard is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas K. Hubbard has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 211 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Anthropology, 14 papers in Archeology and 12 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Thomas K. Hubbard's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (25 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (14 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (12 papers). Thomas K. Hubbard is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (25 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (14 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (12 papers). Thomas K. Hubbard collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Thomas K. Hubbard's co-authors include Deborah Steiner, John Gibert and Bruce Rind and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Behavioral Sciences & the Law and The Classical World.

In The Last Decade

Thomas K. Hubbard

36 papers receiving 130 citations

Peers

Thomas K. Hubbard
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Anthropology 152
  • Archeology 49
  • Philosophy 46
  • Literature and Literary Theory 39
  • Organic Chemistry 38
Replace Niall W. Slater with:
Niall W. Slater United States
Ralph M. Rosen United States
Nicolas P. Gross United States
Donald J. Mastronarde United States
Pietro Pucci United States
Seth L. Schein United States
Michael Silk United Kingdom
Aeschylus
Nancy Worman United States
Aristophanes
Niall W. Slater United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Thomas K. Hubbard
Thomas K. Hubbard · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Thomas K. Hubbard
Thomas K. Hubbard · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas K. Hubbard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas K. Hubbard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas K. Hubbard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas K. Hubbard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas K. Hubbard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas K. Hubbard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas K. Hubbard. The network helps show where Thomas K. Hubbard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas K. Hubbard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas K. Hubbard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas K. Hubbard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas K. Hubbard. Thomas K. Hubbard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 3
4 7
5 1
6
The invention of Sulpicia
4
7
Two Notes on the Myth of Aeacus in Pindar
1
8 12
9 3
10
Pindar and Sophocles: Ajax as Epinician Hero
1
11 17
12 11
13 3
14
Theban nationalism and poetic apology in Pindar, Pythian 9. 76-96
1
15
Envy and the Invisible Roar: Pindar, Pythian 11.30
4
16 1
17 27
18 4
19 0
20 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026