Thomas J. Esposito

153 papers receiving 4.5k citations

Peers

Thomas J. Esposito
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Emergency Medicine 1.6k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 229
  • Surgery 1.8k
  • Safety Research 258
  • Clinical Psychology 438
Replace Marie Crandall with:
Marie Crandall United States
Steven R. Lowenstein United States
Harold K. Simon United States
Evaline A. Alessandrini United States
Cynthia J. Berg United States
A.J.P. Schrijvers Netherlands
Guillermo Carroli Argentina
Katherine J. Deans United States
C. William Schwab United States
Ellice Lieberman United States
Thomas J. Esposito relative to Marie Crandall United States Marie Crandall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.8×
Marie Crandall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Esposito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Esposito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Esposito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Esposito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Esposito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Esposito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Esposito. The network helps show where Thomas J. Esposito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas J. Esposito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas J. Esposito Line = papers co-authored together Thomas J. Esposito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 162 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005357
2 2008240
3 2013193
4 2010156
5 2002156
6 1995144
7 2013141
8 1995138
9 199498
10 199197
11 199196
12 201185
13 200384
14 200483
15 200683
16 199478
17 199177
18 199277
19 200675
20 199370

About Thomas J. Esposito

Thomas J. Esposito is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, General Health Professions and Safety Research, having authored 162 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (42 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (35 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (28 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (27 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (15 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (12 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (11 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (1.6k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (229 citations), Surgery (1.8k citations), Safety Research (258 citations) and Clinical Psychology (438 citations). Thomas J. Esposito has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Fred A. Luchette, Richard L. Gamelli, Kimberly A. Davis, R. Lawrence Reed, John M. Santaniello, Nels D. Sanddal, Nico Trocmé, Stuart Reynolds, David V. Feliciano and Grace S. Rozycki. Their work appears in journals such as Children and Youth Services Review, Child Abuse & Neglect, The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and The American Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact