Thomas J. Baas
- Genetics top 10%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Plant Science
- Molecular Biology
- Small Animals top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jack C. M. DekkersMassoud MalekMax F. RothschildLocke A. KarrikerKenneth J. StalderMark KnauerColin JohnsonT. A. Houser
- Topics
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers)Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas J. Baas
10 papers receiving 377 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Genetics 298
- Animal Science and Zoology 176
- Plant Science 83
- Molecular Biology 78
- Small Animals 36
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Baas
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Baas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Baas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Baas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Baas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Baas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Baas. The network helps show where Thomas J. Baas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Baas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Baas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Baas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Baas. Thomas J. Baas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | Mortality Disposal Analysis | 1 |
| 5 | 352 | |
| 6 | Factors Impacting Production and Economic Variability in Traditional Midwest Swine Enterprises | 1 |
| 7 | ISU Swine Enterprise Records Program | 2 |
| 8 | Evaluation of Real-time Ultrasound and Carcass Characteristics for Assessing Carcass Composition in Swine | 1 |
| 9 | Variation of Muscle Quality Parameters within the Longissimus Muscle | 1 |
| 10 | Comparison of Methods for Evaluation of Chemical Lipid Content in the Longissimus Muscle | 3 |
About Thomas J. Baas
Thomas J. Baas is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Virology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (176 citations), Genetics (298 citations) and Small Animals (36 citations). Thomas J. Baas has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jack C. M. Dekkers, Massoud Malek, Max F. Rothschild, Locke A. Karriker, Kenneth J. Stalder, Mark Knauer, Colin Johnson, T. A. Houser, Joseph G. Sebranek and Brad J. Thacker. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Mammalian Genome.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.