Thomas Hovestadt
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Genetics top 2%
- Ecology top 2%
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Hans Joachim PoethkeHans‐Joachim PoethkeNico BlüthgenOliver MitesserAlexander KubischBrigitte FialaNils BlüthgenFlorian Menzel
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (53 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (46 papers)Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (30 papers)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Hovestadt
92 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 2.1k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.6k
- Genetics 1.1k
- Ecology 1.0k
- Ecological Modeling 769
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hovestadt
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hovestadt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hovestadt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hovestadt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hovestadt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hovestadt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hovestadt. The network helps show where Thomas Hovestadt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Hovestadt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Hovestadt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Hovestadt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Hovestadt. Thomas Hovestadt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3D Flight Path Tracking of Butterflies by Image Processing | 2 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | The relative contribution of individual and kin selection to the evolution of density-dependent dispersal rates | 69 |
| 19 | 404 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Thomas Hovestadt
Thomas Hovestadt is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 94 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (53 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (46 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (769 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.6k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (2.1k citations). Thomas Hovestadt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Hans Joachim Poethke, Hans‐Joachim Poethke, Nico Blüthgen, Oliver Mitesser, Alexander Kubisch, Brigitte Fiala, Nils Blüthgen, Florian Menzel, Dries Bonte and Andreas Gros. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.