Anna Stöckl

813 total citations
24 papers, 488 citations indexed

About

Anna Stöckl is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Stöckl has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 488 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 11 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Anna Stöckl's work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (15 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers). Anna Stöckl is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (15 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers). Anna Stöckl collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and United States. Anna Stöckl's co-authors include Eric J. Warrant, Almut Kelber, David C. O’Carroll, Stanley Heinze, Willi A. Ribi, Basil el Jundi, James J. Foster, Simon Sponberg, Keram Pfeiffer and S. Chandler and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Anna Stöckl

22 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Stöckl Sweden 13 293 280 175 68 62 24 488
Jamie C. Theobald United States 14 399 1.4× 355 1.3× 252 1.4× 79 1.2× 142 2.3× 31 653
James J. Foster Sweden 14 238 0.8× 263 0.9× 155 0.9× 52 0.8× 52 0.8× 29 574
Yoshifumi Yamawaki Japan 13 242 0.8× 227 0.8× 161 0.9× 94 1.4× 86 1.4× 31 448
Jochen Smolka Sweden 15 304 1.0× 377 1.3× 183 1.0× 76 1.1× 43 0.7× 19 684
Frederick R. Prete United States 15 376 1.3× 252 0.9× 271 1.5× 74 1.1× 34 0.5× 30 574
Cole Gilbert United States 13 200 0.7× 292 1.0× 121 0.7× 133 2.0× 59 1.0× 22 433
Miriam J. Henze Sweden 13 313 1.1× 301 1.1× 149 0.9× 27 0.4× 62 1.0× 17 525
Andrea Adden Sweden 9 218 0.7× 399 1.4× 264 1.5× 101 1.5× 67 1.1× 11 558
Patrick Schultheiss Australia 19 659 2.2× 342 1.2× 652 3.7× 38 0.6× 67 1.1× 30 870
Martin Y. Peek United States 9 206 0.7× 450 1.6× 175 1.0× 125 1.8× 36 0.6× 10 612

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Stöckl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Stöckl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Stöckl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Stöckl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Stöckl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Stöckl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Stöckl. The network helps show where Anna Stöckl may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Stöckl

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Stöckl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Stöckl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Stöckl. Anna Stöckl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Stöckl, Anna, et al.. (2024). Visual guidance fine-tunes probing movements of an insect appendage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(6). e2306937121–e2306937121. 2 indexed citations
3.
Jechow, Andreas, Anna Stöckl, Franz Hölker, et al.. (2024). Shedding light with harmonic radar: Unveiling the hidden impacts of streetlights on moth flight behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(42). e2401215121–e2401215121. 9 indexed citations
4.
Stöckl, Anna, et al.. (2024). The Hawkmoth Proboscis: An Insect Model for Sensorimotor Control of Reaching and Exploration. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 64(5). 1354–1370.
5.
Foster, James J., et al.. (2023). Flower patterns improve foraging efficiency in bumblebees by guiding approach flight and landing. Functional Ecology. 37(3). 763–777. 10 indexed citations
6.
Stöckl, Anna & James J. Foster. (2022). Night skies through animals’ eyes—Quantifying night-time visual scenes and light pollution as viewed by animals. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 16. 984282–984282. 9 indexed citations
7.
Aiello, Brett R., et al.. (2021). Wing damage affects flight kinematics but not flower tracking performance in hummingbird hawkmoths. Journal of Experimental Biology. 224(4). 9 indexed citations
8.
Walter, Thomas, et al.. (2021). A new innovative real-time tracking method for flying insects applicable under natural conditions. BMC Zoology. 6(1). 35–35. 14 indexed citations
9.
Baird, Emily, et al.. (2021). Spatial tuning of translational optic flow responses in hawkmoths of varying body size. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 208(2). 279–296. 4 indexed citations
10.
Stöckl, Anna, David C. O’Carroll, & Eric J. Warrant. (2020). Hawkmoth lamina monopolar cells act as dynamic spatial filters to optimize vision at different light levels. Science Advances. 6(16). eaaz8645–eaaz8645. 21 indexed citations
11.
Dreyer, David L., Keram Pfeiffer, M. Jerome Beetz, et al.. (2020). Spatial orientation based on multiple visual cues in non-migratory monarch butterflies. Journal of Experimental Biology. 223(Pt 12). 22 indexed citations
12.
Stöckl, Anna & Almut Kelber. (2019). Fuelling on the wing: sensory ecology of hawkmoth foraging. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 205(3). 399–413. 42 indexed citations
13.
Stöckl, Anna, et al.. (2019). The role of lateral optic flow cues in hawkmoth flight control. Journal of Experimental Biology. 222(Pt 13). 12 indexed citations
14.
Stöckl, Anna, Dónal O’Carroll, & Eric J. Warrant. (2017). Higher-order neural processing tunes motion neurons to visual ecology in three species of hawkmoths. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 284(1857). 20170880–20170880. 23 indexed citations
15.
Stöckl, Anna, Jochen Smolka, David C. O’Carroll, & Eric J. Warrant. (2017). Resolving the Trade-off Between Visual Sensitivity and Spatial Acuity—Lessons from Hawkmoths. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 57(5). 1093–1103. 14 indexed citations
16.
Stöckl, Anna, David C. O’Carroll, & Eric J. Warrant. (2016). Neural Summation in the Hawkmoth Visual System Extends the Limits of Vision in Dim Light. Current Biology. 26(6). 821–826. 72 indexed citations
17.
Stöckl, Anna, et al.. (2016). Differential investment in visual and olfactory brain areas reflects behavioural choices in hawk moths. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 26041–26041. 76 indexed citations
18.
19.
Stöckl, Anna, Willi A. Ribi, & Eric J. Warrant. (2015). Adaptations for nocturnal and diurnal vision in the hawkmoth lamina. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 524(1). 160–175. 53 indexed citations
20.
Stöckl, Anna, et al.. (2011). Setting the Pace: New Insights into Central Pattern Generator Interactions in Box Jellyfish Swimming. PLoS ONE. 6(11). e27201–e27201. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jamie C. Theobald Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by James J. Foster Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yoshifumi Yamawaki Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jochen Smolka Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Frederick R. Prete Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cole Gilbert Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Miriam J. Henze Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea Adden Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patrick Schultheiss Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martin Y. Peek
Rankless by CCL
2026