Thomas G. Day

2.1k citations
72 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas G. Day

64 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas G. Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Reproductive Medicine 294
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 263
  • Health Informatics 24
  • Hematology 140
  • Genetics 106
Replace Stefano Palmucci with:
Stefano Palmucci Italy
Mustafa Seçil Türkiye
Takatoshi Aoki Japan
Ellen Marqusee United States
Élisabeth Luporsi France
Takeshi Yoshikawa Japan
Susan J. Copley United Kingdom
A. Dall’Asta Italy
Rocco Trisolini Italy
Christine Massey Canada
Thomas G. Day relative to Stefano Palmucci Italy Stefano Palmucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Stefano Palmucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas G. Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas G. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas G. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas G. Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas G. Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas G. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas G. Day. The network helps show where Thomas G. Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas G. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas G. Day Line = papers co-authored together Thomas G. Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20232
3 20211
4 202033
5 20193
6 201715
7 20152
8 20123
9 20124
10 20119
11 200834
12 200853
13 199483
14
TOPOGRAPHY OF APOLLINARIS-PATERA AND MAADIM-VALLIS - AUTOMATED EXTRACTION OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS
19932
15 199044
16 198930
17
Visualisation Of Topographic Data Using Video Animation
19885
18
QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS PRODUCED BY AUTOMATIC STEREOMATCHERS FROM SPOT IMAGE PAIRS
19883
19 1988151
20 19860

About Thomas G. Day

Thomas G. Day is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Geology and Hematology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (13 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (7 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers) and Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (294 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (263 citations), Health Informatics (24 citations), Hematology (140 citations) and Genetics (106 citations). Thomas G. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gordon R. Tobin, Julian P. Smith, Jan‐Peter Müller, John Simpson, Chandana Venkateswara Rao, J. Andrew Carlson, Zhenmin Lei, James L. Wittliff, Emma Drašar and S L Thein. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prenatal Diagnosis, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026