Steve Smith

1.8k total citations
37 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Steve Smith is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Steve Smith has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Oncology, 10 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 8 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Steve Smith's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (16 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (7 papers) and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (3 papers). Steve Smith is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (16 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (7 papers) and Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (3 papers). Steve Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Steve Smith's co-authors include Janet S. St. Lawrence, Donna Cook, Harold V. Hood, Jeffrey A. Kelly, Stephen P Halloran, Sue Moss, Christopher Mathews, Ramesh Arasaradnam, Helen E. Seaman and Julia Snowball and has published in prestigious journals such as Gut, American Journal of Public Health and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Steve Smith

33 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steve Smith United Kingdom 13 522 293 266 261 220 37 1.2k
Cynthia Jorgensen United States 18 389 0.7× 247 0.8× 170 0.6× 136 0.5× 298 1.4× 34 1.7k
Helen Brown Canada 27 1.2k 2.2× 242 0.8× 325 1.2× 533 2.0× 742 3.4× 93 2.8k
David W. Lyter United States 16 279 0.5× 374 1.3× 434 1.6× 166 0.6× 343 1.6× 25 1.1k
Kenneth A. Katz United States 25 242 0.5× 111 0.4× 167 0.6× 83 0.3× 458 2.1× 70 1.6k
Ann Richardson New Zealand 23 423 0.8× 185 0.6× 73 0.3× 65 0.2× 472 2.1× 61 1.5k
Brian Colwell United States 16 458 0.9× 182 0.6× 61 0.2× 147 0.6× 193 0.9× 56 1.3k
Judith Luce United States 23 665 1.3× 205 0.7× 38 0.1× 135 0.5× 162 0.7× 38 1.4k
Mary Ann Greene United States 17 379 0.7× 197 0.7× 64 0.2× 117 0.4× 241 1.1× 30 809
Henri Carrara South Africa 21 555 1.1× 166 0.6× 426 1.6× 49 0.2× 716 3.3× 39 1.4k
Tina D. Cunningham United States 20 163 0.3× 196 0.7× 116 0.4× 102 0.4× 197 0.9× 57 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Smith. The network helps show where Steve Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steve Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steve Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steve Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steve Smith. Steve Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bradley, Christopher, Siew Wan Hee, Lazaros Andronis, et al.. (2022). REducing Colonoscopies in patients without significant bowEl DiseasE: the RECEDE Study - protocol for a prospective diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ Open. 12(3). e058559–e058559. 2 indexed citations
2.
Arasaradnam, Ramesh, Neeraj Bhala, Charles F. Evans, et al.. (2020). Faecal immunochemical testing in the COVID-19 era: balancing risk and costs. ˜The œLancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 5(8). 717–719. 14 indexed citations
3.
Cavers, Debbie, Natália Calanzani, Sheina Orbell, et al.. (2018). Development of an evidence-based brief ‘talking’ intervention for non-responders to bowel screening for use in primary care: stakeholder interviews. BMC Family Practice. 19(1). 105–105. 5 indexed citations
4.
Widłak, Monika, Emma Daulton, C. Thomas, et al.. (2018). Risk stratification of symptomatic patients suspected of colorectal cancer using faecal and urinary markers. Colorectal Disease. 20(12). O335–O342. 62 indexed citations
5.
Calanzani, Natália, Debbie Cavers, Gabriele Vojt, et al.. (2017). Is an opportunistic primary care-based intervention for non-responders to bowel screening feasible and acceptable? A mixed-methods feasibility study in Scotland. BMJ Open. 7(10). e016307–e016307. 8 indexed citations
6.
Lecky, Donna M, Tom Nichols, Peter M. Hawkey, et al.. (2017). Informing future research for carriage of multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria: problems with recruiting to an English stool sample community prevalence study. BMJ Open. 7(12). e017947–e017947. 3 indexed citations
7.
Cooper, Jennifer, Nick Parsons, Chris Stinton, et al.. (2017). Risk-adjusted colorectal cancer screening using the FIT and routine screening data: development of a risk prediction model. British Journal of Cancer. 118(2). 285–293. 35 indexed citations
8.
Widłak, Monika, C. Thomas, Mark Thomas, et al.. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of faecal biomarkers in detecting colorectal cancer and adenoma in symptomatic patients. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 45(2). 354–363. 82 indexed citations
9.
Barnett, Karen, David Weller, Steve Smith, et al.. (2016). Understanding of a negative bowel screening result and potential impact on future symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour: a focus group study. Health Expectations. 20(4). 584–592. 6 indexed citations
11.
McGregor, Lesley, Christian von Wagner, Wendy Atkin, et al.. (2016). Reducing the Social Gradient in Uptake of the NHS Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Using a Narrative-Based Information Leaflet: A Cluster-Randomised Trial. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2016. 1–10. 12 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Steve, et al.. (2013). Outcomes of faecal occult blood tests requested outside the UK National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 66(4). 330–334. 5 indexed citations
15.
Moss, Susan, Christine Campbell, J Melia, et al.. (2011). Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot. Gut. 61(1). 101–107. 93 indexed citations
16.
Clow, David W., et al.. (2011). Assessing possible visitor-use impacts on water quality in Yosemite National Park, California. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 183(1-4). 197–215. 10 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Steve. (1998). Skilled care counts. Nursing Standard. 13(2). 25–25. 3 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Steve. (1994). The logic of accidental nuclear war. International Affairs. 70(1). 136–137. 20 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Steve. (1989). Leisure today: selected readings.. 24(4). 161–162.
20.
Kelly, Jeffrey A., Janet S. St. Lawrence, Harold V. Hood, Steve Smith, & Donna Cook. (1988). Nurses' Attitudes Toward AIDS. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 19(2). 78–83. 145 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026