Prenatal Diagnosis

7.3k papers and 131.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.3k papers published in Prenatal Diagnosis in the last decades have received a total of 131.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Prenatal Diagnosis usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (5.0k papers), Genetics (1.8k papers) and Surgery (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4.1k papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1.2k papers) and Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (981 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Prenatal Diagnosis are K. H. Nicolaides, Kevin Spencer, Howard Cuckle, Lyn S. Chitty, Nicholas Wald, Diana W. Bianchi, Peter Benn, Nicholas J. Cowans, Jan Deprest and M.A. Ferguson‐Smith.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Prenatal Diagnosis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Prenatal Diagnosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Prenatal Diagnosis.

Countries where authors publish in Prenatal Diagnosis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Prenatal Diagnosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Prenatal Diagnosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prenatal Diagnosis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025