Thomas F. O’Meara
- Philosophy top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Surgery
- Gastroenterology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Douglas R. HoughFriedrich Wilhelm Joseph von SchellingMartín HeideggerPaul TillichAquinas Thomas
- Topics
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology (4 papers)Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas F. O’Meara
20 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Philosophy 59
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 56
- Surgery 47
- Gastroenterology 33
- Sociology and Political Science 31
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. O’Meara
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. O’Meara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. O’Meara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. O’Meara more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. O’Meara
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. O’Meara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. O’Meara. The network helps show where Thomas F. O’Meara may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. O’Meara
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. O’Meara. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. O’Meara based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. O’Meara. Thomas F. O’Meara is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Superstition and irreverence | 1 |
| 2 | Erich Przywara, S.J.: His Theology and His World | 1 |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Church and Culture: German Catholic Theology, 1860-1914 | 2 |
| 10 | Theology of ministry | 10 |
| 11 | Abdominal aortic aneurysm with initial symptom of duodenal obstruction. | 14 |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | The Unconditional in Human Knowledge: Four Early Essays | 3 |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Paul Tillich in Catholic thought | 1 |
About Thomas F. O’Meara
Thomas F. O’Meara is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Religious studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Philosophy and Theology (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (4 papers) and Christian Theology and Mission (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (33 citations), Philosophy (59 citations) and Religious studies (24 citations). Thomas F. O’Meara has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Douglas R. Hough, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von Schelling, Martín Heidegger, Paul Tillich and Aquinas Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology and Harvard Theological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.