Thomas F. O’Brien
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations
- Demography
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Co-authors
- Harold BlakemoreLester D. LangleyLawrence A. ClaytonBill AlbertDirk KruijtThomas SchoonoverPaul W. DrakeJonathan C. Brown
- Topics
- Historical Studies in Latin America (6 papers)Latin American history and culture (5 papers)Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (2 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewJournal of American HistoryThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaMexico
In The Last Decade
Thomas F. O’Brien
20 papers receiving 107 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Sociology and Political Science 44
- Political Science and International Relations 38
- Demography 28
- Economics and Econometrics 18
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. O’Brien
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. O’Brien more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. O’Brien
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. O’Brien. The network helps show where Thomas F. O’Brien may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. O’Brien
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. O’Brien. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. O’Brien based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. O’Brien. Thomas F. O’Brien is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | The nitrate industry and Chile's crucial transition, 1870-1891 | 9 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Thomas F. O’Brien
Thomas F. O’Brien is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Demography and Urban Studies, having authored 21 papers that have together received 135 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies in Latin America (6 papers), Latin American history and culture (5 papers) and Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (28 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (17 citations) and Cultural Studies (14 citations). Thomas F. O’Brien has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Harold Blakemore, Lester D. Langley, Lawrence A. Clayton, Bill Albert, Dirk Kruijt, Thomas Schoonover, Paul W. Drake, Jonathan C. Brown, Michael Monteón and Thomas Wright. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.