Thomas F. Kemp
- Materials Chemistry
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Mark E. SmithJohn V. HannaMary E. SmithPeter R. SlaterD. L. CarrollT.J. BastowJosé M. Porras‐VázquezPatrick C. Howlett
- Topics
- Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (12 papers)Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (11 papers)NMR spectroscopy and applications (4 papers)
- Journals
- ACS Applied Materials & InterfacesJournal of Materials ChemistryThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Thomas F. Kemp
21 papers receiving 560 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Materials Chemistry 313
- Spectroscopy 178
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 95
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 91
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 73
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. Kemp
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. Kemp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. Kemp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. Kemp. The network helps show where Thomas F. Kemp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. Kemp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. Kemp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. Kemp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. Kemp. Thomas F. Kemp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 49 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | Towards DNP enhanced solid-state NMR at 14.1T | 1 |
| 12 | 87 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | Boron-10 NMR: what extra information can it give about borate glasses? | 6 |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 65 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Thomas F. Kemp
Thomas F. Kemp is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Ceramics and Composites and Materials Chemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 567 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (11 papers) and NMR spectroscopy and applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ceramics and Composites (66 citations), Spectroscopy (178 citations) and Catalysis (57 citations). Thomas F. Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Mark E. Smith, John V. Hanna, Mary E. Smith, Peter R. Slater, D. L. Carroll, T.J. Bastow, José M. Porras‐Vázquez, Patrick C. Howlett, Maria Forsyth and Kevin J. Pike. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Journal of Materials Chemistry and The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.