M. H. Lewis

3.5k total citations
114 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

M. H. Lewis is a scholar working on Ceramics and Composites, Materials Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, M. H. Lewis has authored 114 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 61 papers in Ceramics and Composites, 54 papers in Materials Chemistry and 30 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in M. H. Lewis's work include Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (55 papers), Glass properties and applications (17 papers) and Advanced materials and composites (12 papers). M. H. Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (55 papers), Glass properties and applications (17 papers) and Advanced materials and composites (12 papers). M. H. Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. M. H. Lewis's co-authors include R. J. Lumby, R. Dupree, Markys G. Cain, P. S. Bell, M. E. Smith, B. North, J. Billingham, E.G. Butler, A.H. Jones and Naoyuki Kitamura and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Food Chemistry and Cement and Concrete Research.

In The Last Decade

M. H. Lewis

110 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

M. H. Lewis
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Materials Chemistry 1.3k
  • Ceramics and Composites 1.2k
  • Mechanical Engineering 725
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 325
  • Mechanics of Materials 308
Replace E. Breval with:
E. Breval United States
James F. Shackelford United States
A. Paul India
Ian W. Donald United Kingdom
Thommy Ekström Sweden
L. Esposito Italy
Keizo Uematsu Japan
Carl R. Robbins United States
Shiro Shimada Japan
IVAN B. CUTLER United States
E. Breval United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to M. H. Lewis
M. H. Lewis · 1×
Citations per year, relative to M. H. Lewis
M. H. Lewis · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by M. H. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. H. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. H. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. H. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. H. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. H. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. H. Lewis. The network helps show where M. H. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. H. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. H. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. H. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. H. Lewis. M. H. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 4
3
Setting up a screening service for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
4
4 28
5 2
6 4
7 2
8 9
9 10
10 0
11 4
12 9
13 29
14 23
15 14
16 15
17
Transformation Twinning in Synthetic Neighborite
3
18 11
19 25
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026