Mark E. Newton

5.8k total citations
123 papers, 4.7k citations indexed

About

Mark E. Newton is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Geophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark E. Newton has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 4.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 93 papers in Materials Chemistry, 36 papers in Geophysics and 29 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Mark E. Newton's work include Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (77 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (36 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (26 papers). Mark E. Newton is often cited by papers focused on Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (77 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (36 papers) and Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (26 papers). Mark E. Newton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Mark E. Newton's co-authors include Julie V. Macpherson, J M Baker, Patrick R. Unwin, Laura A. Hutton, Daniel J. Twitchen, David Fisher, Simon C. Lawson, Ben L. Green, Zoë J. Ayres and Peter J. Sadler and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Reviews, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

Mark E. Newton

123 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Mark E. Newton
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Materials Chemistry 3.0k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.3k
  • Geophysics 1.1k
  • Electrochemistry 856
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 738
Replace Florian Maier with:
Florian Maier Germany
G. Tourillon France
A. Ya. Vul’ Russia
Stuart Turner Belgium
John N. Russell United States
Amitesh Maiti United States
Hoydoo You United States
Shinji Kohara Japan
Julio Pellicer‐Porres Spain
Steven L. Carnie Australia
Florian Maier Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mark E. Newton
Mark E. Newton · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mark E. Newton
Mark E. Newton · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Newton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Newton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Newton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Newton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Newton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Newton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Newton. The network helps show where Mark E. Newton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Newton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Newton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Newton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Newton. Mark E. Newton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 15
3 1
4 13
5 35
6 93
7 26
8 25
9 61
10 122
11 109
12 104
13 13
14 5
15 28
16 23
17 58
18 86
19 10
20 19

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026