Thomas Elliott Snyder
- Genetics
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Insect Science
- Plant Science
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Topics
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers)Plant and animal studies (6 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Economic EntomologyThe American Midland NaturalistAmerican Journal of Potato Research
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Elliott Snyder
8 papers receiving 113 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Genetics 90
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 85
- Insect Science 36
- Plant Science 26
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 23
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Elliott Snyder
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Elliott Snyder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Elliott Snyder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Elliott Snyder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Elliott Snyder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Elliott Snyder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Elliott Snyder. The network helps show where Thomas Elliott Snyder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Elliott Snyder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Elliott Snyder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Elliott Snyder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Elliott Snyder. Thomas Elliott Snyder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Biology of the termites of the eastern United States, with preventive and remedial measures | 1 |
| 2 | Second supplement to the annotated, subject-heading bibliography of termites, 1961-1965 | 4 |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | Supplement to the annotated, subject-heading bibliography of Termites, 1955 to 1960 | 8 |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | Annotated, subject-heading bibliography of termites 1350 B.C. TO A.D. 1954 | 13 |
About Thomas Elliott Snyder
Thomas Elliott Snyder is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Genetics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 123 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (85 citations), Genetics (90 citations) and Insect Science (36 citations). Thomas Elliott Snyder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles E. Cunningham, R. V. Akeley, L. C. Peterson and Alexander Wetmore. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Entomology, The American Midland Naturalist and American Journal of Potato Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.