Thomas E. DeMeo

414 citations
8 papers · 223 indexed · h-index 4

Thomas E. DeMeo

7 papers receiving 181 citations

Peers

Thomas E. DeMeo
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 150
  • Global and Planetary Change 153
  • Atmospheric Science 106
  • Insect Science 41
  • Ecology 52
Replace Michal Synek with:
Michal Synek Czechia
Marek Ježík Slovakia
Arne Buechling Czechia
Lance A. Asherin United States
Jana Lábusová Czechia
Ricardo Ibáñez Spain
Branislav Cvjetković Bosnia and Herzegovina
Serena Antonucci Italy
Milan Barna Slovakia
Lena Muffler Germany
Thomas E. DeMeo relative to Michal Synek Czechia Michal Synek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Michal Synek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. DeMeo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. DeMeo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. DeMeo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. DeMeo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. DeMeo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. DeMeo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. DeMeo. The network helps show where Thomas E. DeMeo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. DeMeo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. DeMeo Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. DeMeo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Tracking progress : the monitoring process used in collaborative forest landscape restoration projects in the Pacific Northwest
20155
2 20121
3 20101
4
Assessing ecological departure from reference conditions with the Fire Regime Condition Class (FRCC) Mapping Tool
20063
5 199841
6 19977
7
Botanical reconnaissance of Big Run Bog Candidate Research Natural Area. Forest Service general technical report (Final)
19962
8 1995163

About Thomas E. DeMeo

Thomas E. DeMeo is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Atmospheric Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (2 papers), Forest ecology and management (2 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (1 paper) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (150 citations), Global and Planetary Change (153 citations), Atmospheric Science (106 citations), Insect Science (41 citations) and Ecology (52 citations). Thomas E. DeMeo has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Jordan. Frequent co-authors include Marc D. Abrams, David A. Orwig, Charles M. Ruffner, Rose‐Marie Muzika, Jeffrey L. Jones, Bernard T. Bormann and Stephen W. Barrett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ecology, The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, Forest Ecology and Management, Natural Areas Journal and OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026