Thomas Douglas

3.7k citations
103 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Douglas

98 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Thomas Douglas
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 778
  • Business and International Management 32
  • Health 136
  • Clinical Psychology 222
  • Catalysis 71
Replace John H. Evans with:
John H. Evans United States
Jennifer L. Howell United States
Sara Green Denmark
Michael J. Green United Kingdom
Jonathan D. Moreno United States
Nancy Lee Jones United States
John Marshall Townsend United States
David Adam Canada
Tianli Liu China
Martyn Pickersgill United Kingdom
Thomas Douglas relative to John H. Evans United States John H. Evans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×71×
John H. Evans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Douglas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Douglas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Douglas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Douglas. The network helps show where Thomas Douglas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Douglas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Douglas Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Douglas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 103 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008153
2 2008131
3 201579
4 201677
5 201875
6 201771
7 201167
8 201665
9 201458
10 201056
11 201449
12 200648
13 200740
14 201338
15 201734
16 201231
17 201429
18 200627
19 201326
20 201826

About Thomas Douglas

Thomas Douglas is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 103 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (43 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (24 papers), Free Will and Agency (19 papers), Ethics in medical practice (12 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (8 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (778 citations), Business and International Management (32 citations), Health (136 citations), Clinical Psychology (222 citations) and Catalysis (71 citations). Thomas Douglas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Julian Savulescu, Andrew S. Weller, Christopher Gyngell, Alberto Giubilini, Adrian B. Chaplin, Hannah Maslen, Jonathan Pugh, Katrien Devolder, S.K. Brayshaw and Nadira S. Faber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Ethics, Bioethics, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Journal of Applied Philosophy and Neuroethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact