Thomas Clarke

401 citations
5 papers · 159 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Clarke

5 papers receiving 147 citations

Peers

Thomas Clarke
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Social Psychology 106
  • Gender Studies 46
  • Reproductive Medicine 17
  • Clinical Psychology 34
  • General Psychology 2
Replace Flávia do Bonsucesso Teixeira with:
Flávia do Bonsucesso Teixeira Brazil
Jack Byrne New Zealand
Alexis Matza United States
Alex González United States
Nadine Nakamura United States
Amrita Sarkar India
Ida Linander Sweden
Hillary K. Hecht United States
Roz Queen Canada
Travis Salway Canada
Thomas Clarke relative to Flávia do Bonsucesso Teixeira Brazil Flávia do Bonsucesso Teixeira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Flávia do Bonsucesso Teixeira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Clarke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Clarke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Clarke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Clarke. The network helps show where Thomas Clarke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Clarke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Clarke Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Clarke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 2009123
2 201930
3 19943
4 20072
5
The Influence of Social Connections and Social Support on Academic Achievement Among LGBT and Straight Students
20121

About Thomas Clarke

Thomas Clarke is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (2 papers), Psychology of Social Influence (1 paper), Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Vector-borne infectious diseases (1 paper) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (106 citations), Gender Studies (46 citations), Reproductive Medicine (17 citations), Clinical Psychology (34 citations) and General Psychology (2 citations). Thomas Clarke has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Stephen T. Russell, Elinore F. McCance‐Katz, Christopher M. Jones, Jane Somerville, Leon M. Gerlis, Mike Clarke and A Dewar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Cardiovascular Pathology and UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact