Thomas C. Wood

51 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Thomas C. Wood
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Pharmacology 841
  • Reproductive Medicine 406
  • Genetics 787
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 640
  • Molecular Biology 1.5k
Replace Charles A. Strott with:
Charles A. Strott United States
C. Jo Corbin United States
Gabriele Möller Germany
John M. Trant United States
J. Ian Mason United Kingdom
Roger S. Holmes Australia
Robert L. Clark United States
Midori Yoshida Japan
David Pulford United Kingdom
Anita H. Payne United States
Thomas C. Wood relative to Charles A. Strott United States Charles A. Strott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Charles A. Strott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Wood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Wood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Wood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Wood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Wood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Wood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Wood. The network helps show where Thomas C. Wood may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Wood, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Wood Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Wood links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Sulfation and sulfotransferases 1: Sulfotransferase molecular biology: cDNAs and genes.
1997358
2 1997322
3 1997243
4 1999155
5 1997148
6 1992138
7 1998130
8 2001121
9 1994117
10 1998115
11 2006110
12 1998101
13 198996
14 201392
15 199479
16 199776
17 199375
18 199374
19 199269
20 199368

About Thomas C. Wood

Thomas C. Wood is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Pharmacology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (13 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (11 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (9 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (7 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (5 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (841 citations), Reproductive Medicine (406 citations), Genetics (787 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (640 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.5k citations). Thomas C. Wood has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and India. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. Weinshilboum, Rebecca B. Raftogianis, Diane M. Otterness, Ibrahim A. Aksoy, Chengtao Her, R. M. Weinshilboum, D. E. Wildt, Jon A. Van Loon, John Seidensticker and Trishna Dutta. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, Reproduction, Molecular Pharmacology, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact