G. W. Asher
Impact in
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 1%
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
Papers in
-
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock 32
- Ecology 35
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 32
- Ecology and biodiversity studies 7
- Co-authors
- A. J. PetersonM. W. FisherHenry N. JabbourC. J. MorrowGraham K. BarrellP. F. FennessyIan ScottD. M. Duganzich
- Journals
- Reproduction (15 papers)Animal Reproduction Science (10 papers)Theriogenology (4 papers)Livestock Science (3 papers)Reproduction Fertility and Development (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
G. W. Asher
45 papers receiving 804 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Agronomy and Crop Science 507
- Reproductive Medicine 169
- Ecology 456
- Equine 26
- Small Animals 104
Countries citing papers authored by G. W. Asher
This map shows the geographic impact of G. W. Asher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. W. Asher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. W. Asher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. W. Asher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. W. Asher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. W. Asher. The network helps show where G. W. Asher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. W. Asher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 30 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 29 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 21 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 74 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 27 | |
| 17 | 1990 | 26 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 46 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 41 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 50 |
About G. W. Asher
G. W. Asher is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, Genetics, Small Animals and Equine, having authored 45 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (32 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (32 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (20 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (7 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (4 papers) and Animal Diversity and Health Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (507 citations), Reproductive Medicine (169 citations), Ecology (456 citations), Equine (26 citations) and Small Animals (104 citations). G. W. Asher has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include A. J. Peterson, M. W. Fisher, Henry N. Jabbour, C. J. Morrow, Graham K. Barrell, P. F. Fennessy, Ian Scott, D. M. Duganzich, R. P. Littlejohn and D.K. Berg. Their work appears in journals such as Reproduction, Animal Reproduction Science, Theriogenology, Livestock Science and Reproduction Fertility and Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.