Thomás C. Windes
Impact in
- Archeology top 1%
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Paleontology top 2%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Papers in
-
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies 5
- Anthropology 18
- Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology 10
- Archaeology and Natural History 8
- Co-authors
- Stephen H. LeksonW. H. WillsPatricia A. GilmanWilliam B. GillespiePeter J. McKennaW. James JudgeJohn R. SteinLinda S. Cordell
- Journals
- American Antiquity (6 papers)KIVA (3 papers)Journal of Archaeological Science (2 papers)Antiquity (1 paper)Journal of Field Archaeology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomás C. Windes
22 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Archeology 147
- Paleontology 338
- Anthropology 256
- Space and Planetary Science 12
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 45
Countries citing papers authored by Thomás C. Windes
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomás C. Windes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomás C. Windes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomás C. Windes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomás C. Windes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomás C. Windes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomás C. Windes. The network helps show where Thomás C. Windes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Thomás C. Windes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 4 | A Dendrochronological Study of Nineteenth-Century San Miguel del Vado and San José del Vado in Northeastern New Mexico | 2011 | 1 |
| 5 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 38 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 71 | |
| 11 | Investigations at 29SJ 629 in Marcia's Rincon and the Fajada Gap Pueblo II community, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico | 1993 | 2 |
| 12 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 46 | |
| 15 | Artifactual and biological analyses | 1988 | 2 |
| 16 | 1988 | 77 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 56 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 2 |
About Thomás C. Windes
Thomás C. Windes is a scholar working on Archeology, Anthropology, Paleontology, Atmospheric Science and Ecology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (12 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (10 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (8 papers), Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (5 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers) and Geological and Geochemical Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (147 citations), Paleontology (338 citations), Anthropology (256 citations), Space and Planetary Science (12 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (45 citations). Thomás C. Windes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen H. Lekson, W. H. Wills, Patricia A. Gilman, William B. Gillespie, Peter J. McKenna, W. James Judge, John R. Stein, Linda S. Cordell, R. Kyle Bocinsky and Ruth M. Van Dyke. Their work appears in journals such as American Antiquity, KIVA, Journal of Archaeological Science, Antiquity and Journal of Field Archaeology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.