Thomas C. Underwood

34 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers

Thomas C. Underwood
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 129
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 98
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 81
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 47
  • Biomedical Engineering 34
Replace Madhusudhan Kundrapu with:
Madhusudhan Kundrapu United States
E. Pawelec Poland
I. M. Rittersdorf United States
R. McAdams United Kingdom
Jim Browning United States
R. Friedl Germany
A. S. Arakcheev Russia
Lang Cui United States
A. Uccello Italy
Daniela Pedrini Italy
Thomas C. Underwood relative to Madhusudhan Kundrapu United States Madhusudhan Kundrapu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Madhusudhan Kundrapu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Underwood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Underwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Underwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Underwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Underwood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Underwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Underwood. The network helps show where Thomas C. Underwood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas C. Underwood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas C. Underwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas C. Underwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas C. Underwood. Thomas C. Underwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 3
5 0
6 3
7 6
8 7
9 2
10 3
11 6
12 2
13 14
14 3
15 6
16 5
17
Spectroscopic Study of a Pulsed High-Energy Plasma Deflagration Accelerator
1
18
Experimental Validation of a Branched Solution Model for Magnetosonic Ionization Waves in Plasma Accelerators
1
19 28
20 18

About Thomas C. Underwood

Thomas C. Underwood is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Catalysis, having authored 39 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (14 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (11 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (81 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (98 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (129 citations). Thomas C. Underwood has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Mark Cappelli, Theodore Mouratidis, Victor A. Miller, Laxminarayan L. Raja, Frederick J. Schöen, Subrata Roy, Robert J. Levy, Bryan Glaz, Richard E. Phillips and Jeffrey G. Bell. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Applied Physics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026