R. McAdams

687 total citations
23 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

R. McAdams is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, R. McAdams has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 14 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in R. McAdams's work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (14 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (13 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (6 papers). R. McAdams is often cited by papers focused on Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (14 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (13 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (6 papers). R. McAdams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and France. R. McAdams's co-authors include Andrew Holmes, Elizabeth Surrey, D. King, Jim Williams, A Crowe, R. King, M. Hölzl, E. Strumberger, E. Nardon and G. Huysmans and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, Review of Scientific Instruments and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms.

In The Last Decade

R. McAdams

22 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. McAdams United Kingdom 9 186 116 114 112 90 23 335
D. C. Seo South Korea 13 181 1.0× 147 1.3× 56 0.5× 251 2.2× 120 1.3× 47 464
E. V. Oreshkin Russia 12 130 0.7× 43 0.4× 75 0.7× 143 1.3× 44 0.5× 38 330
F. Naito Japan 9 172 0.9× 168 1.4× 79 0.7× 156 1.4× 30 0.3× 87 463
Z. Segalov United States 9 266 1.4× 151 1.3× 54 0.5× 37 0.3× 17 0.2× 29 350
Mark Woolston United States 7 219 1.2× 58 0.5× 18 0.2× 54 0.5× 77 0.9× 11 379
R. Friedl Germany 11 246 1.3× 248 2.1× 42 0.4× 155 1.4× 71 0.8× 41 387
L. Schaper Germany 12 424 2.3× 78 0.7× 327 2.9× 163 1.5× 41 0.5× 37 572
R.P. Kensek United States 7 89 0.5× 68 0.6× 75 0.7× 61 0.5× 113 1.3× 20 433
C.J. Timmermans Netherlands 10 228 1.2× 52 0.4× 39 0.3× 23 0.2× 55 0.6× 46 323
H.C. Harjes United States 11 165 0.9× 100 0.9× 20 0.2× 153 1.4× 97 1.1× 41 411

Countries citing papers authored by R. McAdams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. McAdams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. McAdams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. McAdams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. McAdams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. McAdams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. McAdams. The network helps show where R. McAdams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. McAdams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. McAdams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. McAdams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. McAdams. R. McAdams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Holmes, Andrew & R. McAdams. (2022). Space charge compensation of positive ion beams used in magnetic fusion applications. Nuclear Fusion. 62(6). 66017–66017.
2.
Zacks, Jeffrey M., R. McAdams, John A. Booth, et al.. (2013). Preliminary results from the Small Negative Ion Facility (SNIF) at CCFE. AIP conference proceedings. 569–578. 4 indexed citations
3.
McAdams, R., et al.. (2013). Advanced energy recovery concepts for negative ion beamlines in fusion power plants. AIP conference proceedings. 559–568. 12 indexed citations
4.
Hölzl, M., P. Merkel, G. Huysmans, et al.. (2012). Coupling JOREK and STARWALL Codes for Non-linear Resistive-wall Simulations. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 401. 12010–12010. 44 indexed citations
5.
McAdams, R., D. King, Andrew Holmes, et al.. (2011). A Sheath Model for Negative Ion Sources Including the Formation of a Virtual Cathode. AIP conference proceedings. 78–87. 2 indexed citations
6.
McAdams, R., Elizabeth Surrey, & Alain Simonin. (2009). Surface Production of Negative Ions by Positive Ions and Atoms in the Electron Suppressor Region. AIP conference proceedings. 89–98. 6 indexed citations
7.
McAdams, R.. (2007). Pulsed corona treatment of gases: system scaling and efficiency. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 16(4). 703–710. 21 indexed citations
8.
McAdams, R., et al.. (2003). Non-thermal plasma based technologies for the after-treatment of automotive exhaust particulates and marine diesel exhaust NOx. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 6 indexed citations
9.
McAdams, R.. (2001). Prospects for non-thermal atmospheric plasmas for pollution abatement. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics. 34(18). 2810–2821. 102 indexed citations
10.
Proudfoot, G., R. McAdams, & Andrew Holmes. (1994). A new design of a compact high current ion accelerator. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 89(1-4). 1–7. 1 indexed citations
11.
McAdams, R., R. King, Andrew Holmes, & G. Proudfoot. (1993). H-extraction from a magnetic multipole source: the effect of cathode area. Plasma Sources Science and Technology. 2(2). 86–92. 6 indexed citations
12.
McAdams, R., et al.. (1992). Hydrogen/deuterium negative ion scaling from a magnetic multipole ion source. Review of Scientific Instruments. 63(2). 1777–1782. 3 indexed citations
13.
McAdams, R., R. King, G. Proudfoot, & Andrew Holmes. (1992). Pure and cesiated cw volume source performance at the Culham Ion Source Test Stand. AIP conference proceedings. 287. 353–367. 8 indexed citations
14.
McAdams, R., et al.. (1990). Electron suppressors for negative ion sources. Review of Scientific Instruments. 61(8). 2176–2183. 9 indexed citations
15.
McAdams, R., et al.. (1990). Physics tests of an electron suppressor with variable electric and magnetic fields. AIP conference proceedings. 210. 255–265. 1 indexed citations
16.
McAdams, R., et al.. (1990). Recent results on negative ion production and extraction from the Culham Ion Source Test Stand. Review of Scientific Instruments. 61(1). 412–414. 5 indexed citations
17.
McAdams, R., Andrew Holmes, & M. Nightingale. (1988). H− beam extraction experiments on the Culham small multipole source. Review of Scientific Instruments. 59(6). 895–901. 10 indexed citations
18.
McAdams, R. & Sachin Kumar Srivastava. (1983). Electron–photon coincidence technique for the absolute calibration of VUV detectors. Applied Optics. 22(10). 1551–1551. 3 indexed citations
19.
McAdams, R. & Jim Williams. (1982). Large Momentum Transfer Excitation of He(31P) by Electron Impact at 81· 2 eV Incident Energy. Australian Journal of Physics. 35(5). 513–520. 2 indexed citations
20.
McAdams, R., et al.. (1980). Alignment and orientation of the 21P state of helium by electron impact at 29.6 and 51.2 eV. Journal of Physics B Atomic and Molecular Physics. 13(18). 3691–3701. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026