Thomas C. Tuttle

473 total citations
14 papers, 296 citations indexed

About

Thomas C. Tuttle is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas C. Tuttle has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 296 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Management Information Systems, 2 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 1 paper in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Thomas C. Tuttle's work include Information Technology Governance and Strategy (2 papers), Quality and Supply Management (2 papers) and Management Theory and Practice (2 papers). Thomas C. Tuttle is often cited by papers focused on Information Technology Governance and Strategy (2 papers), Quality and Supply Management (2 papers) and Management Theory and Practice (2 papers). Thomas C. Tuttle collaborates with scholars based in United States and China. Thomas C. Tuttle's co-authors include D. Scott Sink, Charles N. Weaver, Edwin A. Locke and Michael D. Matthews and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Academy of Management Perspectives and International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.

In The Last Decade

Thomas C. Tuttle

13 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas C. Tuttle United States 6 143 70 69 38 22 14 296
Carsten Begemann United Kingdom 2 229 1.6× 70 1.0× 103 1.5× 34 0.9× 15 0.7× 3 308
Anna E. Flynn United States 3 162 1.1× 43 0.6× 155 2.2× 35 0.9× 12 0.5× 5 352
Everard van Kemenade Netherlands 8 88 0.6× 45 0.6× 74 1.1× 50 1.3× 14 0.6× 37 312
Martin Fojt United Kingdom 7 104 0.7× 29 0.4× 104 1.5× 57 1.5× 41 1.9× 26 282
T. Hillman Willis United States 7 232 1.6× 78 1.1× 157 2.3× 37 1.0× 26 1.2× 13 399
Masaaki Imai 4 147 1.0× 55 0.8× 134 1.9× 25 0.7× 37 1.7× 9 301
James B. Ayers Sweden 9 155 1.1× 57 0.8× 115 1.7× 14 0.4× 28 1.3× 22 311
Tony Holden United Kingdom 7 76 0.5× 34 0.5× 164 2.4× 32 0.8× 15 0.7× 21 336
Teun Hardjono Netherlands 9 77 0.5× 49 0.7× 140 2.0× 59 1.6× 10 0.5× 15 339
J.F. den Hertog Netherlands 6 81 0.6× 62 0.9× 74 1.1× 85 2.2× 16 0.7× 9 290

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Tuttle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Tuttle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Tuttle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Tuttle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Tuttle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Tuttle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Tuttle. The network helps show where Thomas C. Tuttle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas C. Tuttle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas C. Tuttle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas C. Tuttle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas C. Tuttle. Thomas C. Tuttle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Tuttle, Thomas C.. (2016). Growing Jobs. 1 indexed citations
2.
Tuttle, Thomas C., et al.. (2012). Productivity in a private charity. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 61(5). 563–577. 1 indexed citations
3.
Tuttle, Thomas C., et al.. (2010). Learning from China's business leaders: lessons for troubled times. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 59(3). 274–299. 1 indexed citations
4.
Tuttle, Thomas C.. (1994). Is total quality worth the effort? How do we know?. New Directions for Higher Education. 1994(86). 21–32. 6 indexed citations
6.
Sink, D. Scott & Thomas C. Tuttle. (1989). Planning and Measurement in Your Organization of the Future. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 205 indexed citations
7.
Tuttle, Thomas C. & Charles N. Weaver. (1986). Methodology for Generating Efficiency and Effectiveness Measures (MGEEM): A Guide for Commanders, Managers, and Supervisors.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 1 indexed citations
8.
Tuttle, Thomas C., et al.. (1985). Field Test of the Methodology for Generating Efficiency and Effectiveness Measures,. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 1 indexed citations
9.
Tuttle, Thomas C., et al.. (1985). Assessing performance and productivity in white‐collar organizations. National Productivity Review. 4(3). 211–224. 8 indexed citations
10.
Locke, Edwin A., et al.. (1985). Adding competition to the management basics: An application in the defense department. National Productivity Review. 5(1). 7–21. 2 indexed citations
11.
Tuttle, Thomas C. & D. Scott Sink. (1984). Taking the threat out of productivity measurement. National Productivity Review. 4(1). 24–32. 7 indexed citations
12.
Sink, D. Scott, et al.. (1984). Productivity measurement and evaluation: What is available?. National Productivity Review. 3(3). 265–287. 46 indexed citations
13.
Tuttle, Thomas C.. (1983). Organizational productivity: A challenge for psychologists.. American Psychologist. 38(4). 479–486.
14.
Tuttle, Thomas C.. (1983). Organizational productivity: A challenge for psychologists.. American Psychologist. 38(4). 479–486. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026