Thomas C. Foster
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genetics top 5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Bruce L. McNaughtonChristopher M. NorrisShelley HalpainJennifer L. BizonAshok KumarAsha RaniEmilie F. RissmanGene E. Alexander
- Topics
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms (17 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers)Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (8 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyJapan
In The Last Decade
Thomas C. Foster
43 papers receiving 2.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 937
- Molecular Biology 824
- Genetics 425
- Neurology 372
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Foster
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Foster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Foster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Foster. The network helps show where Thomas C. Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas C. Foster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas C. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas C. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas C. Foster. Thomas C. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 103 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | Long Term Vision Restoration by Gene Therapy in the rd12 Mouse Model of RPE65 Leber Congenital Amaurosis | 1 |
| 14 | 173 | |
| 15 | 263 | |
| 16 | 130 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 96 | |
| 19 | 109 | |
| 20 | 201 |
About Thomas C. Foster
Thomas C. Foster is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (17 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (313 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (937 citations). Thomas C. Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Bruce L. McNaughton, Christopher M. Norris, Shelley Halpain, Jennifer L. Bizon, Ashok Kumar, Asha Rani, Emilie F. Rissman, Gene E. Alexander, Elizabeth L. Glisky and Guy Massicotte. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.