Adam J. Woods
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Neurology top 0.1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ronald A. CohenEric C. PorgesAndrew O’SheaMarom BiksonNicole R. NissimHelena KnotkováMichael A. NitscheMolly E. McLaren
- Topics
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (58 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (53 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (36 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONENeuroImage
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Adam J. Woods
171 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.7k
- Neurology 2.6k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 866
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 574
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 526
Countries citing papers authored by Adam J. Woods
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam J. Woods's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam J. Woods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam J. Woods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam J. Woods
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam J. Woods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam J. Woods. The network helps show where Adam J. Woods may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam J. Woods
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam J. Woods. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam J. Woods based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam J. Woods. Adam J. Woods is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Adam J. Woods
Adam J. Woods is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 178 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (58 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (53 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (36 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (2.6k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.7k citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (866 citations). Adam J. Woods has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ronald A. Cohen, Eric C. Porges, Andrew O’Shea, Marom Bikson, Nicole R. Nissim, Helena Knotková, Michael A. Nitsche, Molly E. McLaren, John W. Philbeck and Aprinda Indahlastari. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.