Thomas C. Dalton

804 citations
21 papers · 94 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas C. Dalton

19 papers receiving 80 citations

Peers

Thomas C. Dalton
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • General Psychology 19
  • Philosophy 19
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 20
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 23
  • Social Psychology 20
Replace Sacha Bem with:
Sacha Bem Netherlands
David M. Terman United States
Nicola Luckhurst
Pearl King United Kingdom
Alfred Binet
Lawrence J. Brown United States
Edward F. Kelly United States
Mary Goulding
chulmin jung
Meg Harris Williams United States
Thomas C. Dalton relative to Sacha Bem Netherlands Sacha Bem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sacha Bem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas C. Dalton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas C. Dalton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas C. Dalton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas C. Dalton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas C. Dalton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas C. Dalton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas C. Dalton. The network helps show where Thomas C. Dalton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Thomas C. Dalton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas C. Dalton Line = papers co-authored together Thomas C. Dalton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200415
2 199213
3 200613
4 20059
5 19967
6 19977
7
Early Experience, the Brain, and Consciousness: An Historical and Interdisciplinary Synthesis
20075
8 19964
9 20074
10 19984
11 20003
12 19852
13
The ontogeny of vonsciousness. John Dewey and Myrtle McGraws contribution to a science of mind
19991
14 19981
15 19961
16 19961
17 19951
18 19941
19
CONSCIOUSNESS REGAINED THE SCIENTIFIC RESTORATION OF MIND AND BRAIN
20031
20 20051

About Thomas C. Dalton

Thomas C. Dalton is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Psychology, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 94 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (1 paper), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper) and Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (19 citations), Philosophy (19 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (20 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (23 citations) and Social Psychology (20 citations). Thomas C. Dalton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rand B. Evans, Lewis P. Lipsitt, Bernard J. Baars and Susan Eckstein. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Review, Journal of American History, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Journal of Consciousness Studies and Review of Policy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact