Sacha Bem

415 total citations
14 papers, 123 citations indexed

About

Sacha Bem is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sacha Bem has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 123 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in General Psychology and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sacha Bem's work include Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers). Sacha Bem is often cited by papers focused on Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (3 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers). Sacha Bem collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Russia and United Kingdom. Sacha Bem's co-authors include Huib Looren de Jong, Huib de Jong, Fred Keijzer, A. H. C. van der Heijden and M. Duijn and has published in prestigious journals such as Consciousness and Cognition, Theory & Psychology and Philosophical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Sacha Bem

13 papers receiving 100 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sacha Bem Netherlands	8	44	35	23	18	18	14	123
N. H. Pronko United States	7	33 0.8×	17 0.5×	17 0.7×	12 0.7×	19 1.1×	25	128
Robert H. Thouless United Kingdom	8	32 0.7×	24 0.7×	4 0.2×	25 1.4×	10 0.6×	20	136
Jordan Taylor United States	6	32 0.7×	93 2.7×	3 0.1×	58 3.2×	18 1.0×	12	182
Edward F. Kelly United States	7	47 1.1×	22 0.6×	5 0.2×	16 0.9×	10 0.6×	18	125
Fillmore H. Sanford United States	7	28 0.6×	13 0.4×	29 1.3×	21 1.2×	6 0.3×	34	128
R. Horacio Etchegoyen Argentina	6	38 0.9×	8 0.2×	24 1.0×	20 1.1×	7 0.4×	17	198
Tracy L. Caldwell United States	7	71 1.6×	37 1.1×	3 0.1×	40 2.2×	44 2.4×	12	170
Louis Zinkin United Kingdom	9	73 1.7×	7 0.2×	50 2.2×	23 1.3×	7 0.4×	22	223
Еkaterina Zavershneva Netherlands	8	43 1.0×	15 0.4×	33 1.4×	11 0.6×	6 0.3×	11	175
Michael Barlev United States	7	35 0.8×	37 1.1×	2 0.1×	53 2.9×	20 1.1×	17	118

Countries citing papers authored by Sacha Bem

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sacha Bem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sacha Bem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sacha Bem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sacha Bem

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sacha Bem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sacha Bem. The network helps show where Sacha Bem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sacha Bem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sacha Bem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sacha Bem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sacha Bem. Sacha Bem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

1.

Bem, Sacha & Huib Looren de Jong. (2013). Theoretical Issues in Psychology: An Introduction. 7 indexed citations

2.

Bem, Sacha & Huib de Jong. (2006). Theoretical Issues in Psychology: An Introduction. 21 indexed citations

3.

Duijn, M. & Sacha Bem. (2005). On the Alleged Illusion of Conscious Will. Philosophical Psychology. 18(6). 699–714. 9 indexed citations

4.

Jong, Huib Looren de, et al.. (2004). Theory in psychology: a review essay of Andre Kukla'smethods of theoretical psychology. Philosophical Psychology. 17(2). 275–295. 1 indexed citations

5.

Bem, Sacha. (2001). The Explanatory Autonomy of Psychology. Theory & Psychology. 11(6). 785–795. 16 indexed citations

6.

Bem, Sacha. (1998). Changing the rules, psychology in the Netherlands, 1900–1985. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 34(1). 73–74. 1 indexed citations

7.

Bem, Sacha. (1998). Changing the rules, psychology in the Netherlands, 1900–1985. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 34(1). 73–74.

8.

Bem, Sacha, et al.. (1997). Eye Movements and Attention. Consciousness and Cognition. 6(2-3). 437–440. 1 indexed citations

9.

Heijden, A. H. C. van der & Sacha Bem. (1997). Successive Approximations to an Adequate Model of Attention. Consciousness and Cognition. 6(2-3). 413–428. 9 indexed citations

10.

Jong, Huib Looren de & Sacha Bem. (1997). Theoretical Issues in Psychology. 25 indexed citations

11.

Bem, Sacha. (1997). The Problem of Encodingism. Theory & Psychology. 7(5). 709–711. 1 indexed citations

12.

Keijzer, Fred & Sacha Bem. (1996). Behavioral systems interpreted as autonomous agents and as coupled dynamical systems: A criticism. Philosophical Psychology. 9(3). 323–346. 10 indexed citations

13.

Bem, Sacha & Fred Keijzer. (1996). Recent Changes in the Concept of Cognition. Theory & Psychology. 6(3). 449–469. 12 indexed citations

14.

Bem, Sacha, et al.. (1985). Studies in the History of Psychology and the Social Sciences 3. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact