Thomas Burnett

33 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Thomas Burnett
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Insect Science 226
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 129
  • Statistics and Probability 34
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 42
  • Plant Science 117
Replace Sara Pasquali with:
Sara Pasquali Italy
James R. Ziegler United States
Tommi Mononen Finland
F. H. D. van Batenburg Netherlands
W. M. Patefield United Kingdom
Jordi Ocaña Spain
Syunro Utida Japan
J. S. Gale United Kingdom
Peter Bailey Australia
Daniel Bearup United Kingdom
Thomas Burnett relative to Sara Pasquali Italy Sara Pasquali's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Sara Pasquali · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Burnett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Burnett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Burnett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Burnett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Burnett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Burnett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Burnett. The network helps show where Thomas Burnett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Burnett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Burnett Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Burnett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195852
2 195147
3 195434
4 197928
5 197120
6 195617
7 195816
8 196016
9 202113
10 195813
11 197711
12 196410
13 196010
14 20209
15 19709
16 19678
17 19627
18 19777
19 19707
20 20246

About Thomas Burnett

Thomas Burnett is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Ecology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 35 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (16 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (5 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (4 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (226 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (129 citations), Statistics and Probability (34 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (42 citations) and Plant Science (117 citations). Thomas Burnett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Donald R. Barr, Donald Guthrie, Christopher Jennison, Thomas Jaki, Franz König, Steven P. Rountree, Nicolás Ballarini, Martin Posch, Charles A. Weatherford and Hugh Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Zoology, Statistics in Medicine, Journal of the American Statistical Association, The American Naturalist and Computer Physics Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact