Thomas Boucher

6.5k total citations
18 papers, 453 citations indexed

About

Thomas Boucher is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Boucher has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 453 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Analytical Chemistry, 10 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Thomas Boucher's work include Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (10 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (8 papers) and Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (5 papers). Thomas Boucher is often cited by papers focused on Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (10 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (8 papers) and Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (5 papers). Thomas Boucher collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Italy. Thomas Boucher's co-authors include M. D. Dyar, Sridhar Mahadevan, CJ Carey, Kate Lepore, E. A. Breves, Stephen Giguere, S. M. Clegg, Paul Bartholomew, Marco Carmosino and Marie V. Ozanne and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Spectroscopy, Journal of Raman Spectroscopy and Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Boucher

17 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Boucher United States 10 304 298 120 76 60 18 453
Sahar Shabbir China 11 264 0.9× 217 0.7× 71 0.6× 45 0.6× 32 0.5× 12 341
CJ Carey United States 10 119 0.4× 128 0.4× 60 0.5× 110 1.4× 55 0.9× 20 347
Jakub Klus Czechia 13 497 1.6× 426 1.4× 190 1.6× 28 0.4× 36 0.6× 18 629
Erik Képeš Czechia 12 407 1.3× 356 1.2× 130 1.1× 19 0.3× 27 0.5× 20 475
Marco Carmosino United States 6 198 0.7× 178 0.6× 76 0.6× 94 1.2× 8 0.1× 17 364
Ashwin Kumar Myakalwar Chile 12 431 1.4× 367 1.2× 127 1.1× 27 0.4× 36 0.6× 22 520
Muhammad Sher Afgan China 13 593 2.0× 506 1.7× 172 1.4× 24 0.3× 21 0.3× 23 679
François R. Doucet Canada 13 469 1.5× 410 1.4× 180 1.5× 42 0.6× 6 0.1× 19 526
Weilun Gu China 12 523 1.7× 449 1.5× 150 1.3× 25 0.3× 23 0.4× 25 595
Francesco Poggialini Italy 19 705 2.3× 602 2.0× 372 3.1× 35 0.5× 12 0.2× 48 982

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Boucher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Boucher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Boucher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Boucher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Boucher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Boucher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Boucher. The network helps show where Thomas Boucher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Boucher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Boucher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Boucher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Boucher. Thomas Boucher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Dyar, M. D., J. Helbert, Thomas Boucher, et al.. (2017). Mapping Venus Mineralogy and Chemistry In Situ from Orbit with Six-Window VNIR Spectroscopy. elib (German Aerospace Center). 3 indexed citations
2.
Lepore, Kate, C. I. Fassett, E. A. Breves, et al.. (2017). Matrix Effects in Quantitative Analysis of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) of Rock Powders Doped with Cr, Mn, Ni, Zn, and Co. Applied Spectroscopy. 71(4). 600–626. 51 indexed citations
3.
Breves, E. A., Kate Lepore, M. D. Dyar, et al.. (2017). Laser-induced breakdown spectra of rock powders at variable ablation and collection angles under Mars-analog conditions. Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy. 137. 46–58. 18 indexed citations
4.
Giguere, Stephen, Thomas Boucher, CJ Carey, Sridhar Mahadevan, & M. D. Dyar. (2017). A Fully Customized Baseline Removal Framework for Spectroscopic Applications. Applied Spectroscopy. 71(7). 1457–1470. 11 indexed citations
5.
Boucher, Thomas, M. D. Dyar, & Sridhar Mahadevan. (2017). Proximal methods for calibration transfer. Journal of Chemometrics. 31(4). 22 indexed citations
6.
Dyar, M. D., C. I. Fassett, Stephen Giguere, et al.. (2016). Comparison of univariate and multivariate models for prediction of major and minor elements from laser-induced breakdown spectra with and without masking. Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy. 123. 93–104. 41 indexed citations
7.
Boucher, Thomas, M. D. Dyar, CJ Carey, Stephen Giguere, & Suvrath Mahadevan. (2016). Calibration Transfer for Spectroscopy in Space Science. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2784. 2 indexed citations
8.
Mezzacappa, Anthony, Noureddine Melikechi, A. Cousin, et al.. (2016). Application of distance correction to ChemCam laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy measurements. Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy. 120. 19–29. 25 indexed citations
9.
Dyar, M. D., Stephen Giguere, CJ Carey, & Thomas Boucher. (2016). Comparison of baseline removal methods for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of geological samples. Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy. 126. 53–64. 45 indexed citations
10.
Lepore, Kate, Thomas Boucher, E. A. Breves, et al.. (2015). Nickel Calibration for Use in Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy on Mars. LPI. 2720. 2 indexed citations
11.
Dyar, M. D., Thomas Boucher, Stephen Giguere, et al.. (2015). Baseline Removal in Raman Spectroscopy: Optimization Techniques. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2464. 1 indexed citations
12.
Boucher, Thomas, M. D. Dyar, CJ Carey, et al.. (2015). Calibration Transfer of LIBS Spectra to Correct for Mars-Earth Lab Differences. LPI. 2773. 1 indexed citations
13.
Boucher, Thomas, CJ Carey, M. D. Dyar, et al.. (2015). Manifold preprocessing for laser‐induced breakdown spectroscopy under Mars conditions. Journal of Chemometrics. 29(9). 484–491. 12 indexed citations
14.
Carey, CJ, Thomas Boucher, Sridhar Mahadevan, Paul Bartholomew, & M. D. Dyar. (2015). Machine learning tools formineral recognition and classification from Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Raman Spectroscopy. 46(10). 894–903. 81 indexed citations
15.
Boucher, Thomas, CJ Carey, Sridhar Mahadevan, & M. D. Dyar. (2015). Aligning Mixed Manifolds. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 29(1). 6 indexed citations
16.
Boucher, Thomas, Marie V. Ozanne, Marco Carmosino, et al.. (2015). A study of machine learning regression methods for major elemental analysis of rocks using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy. 107. 1–10. 131 indexed citations
17.
Anderson, R. B., S. M. Clegg, B. L. Ehlmann, et al.. (2014). Expanded Compositional Database for ChemCam Quantitative Calibration. 1791. 1275.
18.
Boucher, Thomas, et al.. (2014). Machine Learning Tools for Mineral Recognition and Classification from Raman Spectroscopy. 1783. 5053. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026