Thomas Blake

463 total citations
11 papers, 180 citations indexed

About

Thomas Blake is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Blake has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 180 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 5 papers in Safety Research and 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Thomas Blake's work include Auction Theory and Applications (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers). Thomas Blake is often cited by papers focused on Auction Theory and Applications (6 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (5 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers). Thomas Blake collaborates with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Thomas Blake's co-authors include Steven Tadelis, Matthew Backus, Dominic Coey, Dimitriy V. Masterov, Chris Nosko, Jason W. Miesbauer, Andrew K. Koeser, Tianyun Zhang and Jason Grabosky and has published in prestigious journals such as The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Management Science and Journal of Political Economy.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Blake

9 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Blake United States 7 93 75 66 49 32 11 180
Brent Hickman United States 9 81 0.9× 112 1.5× 75 1.1× 45 0.9× 25 0.8× 22 190
Kyungmin Kim United States 8 114 1.2× 156 2.1× 101 1.5× 36 0.7× 51 1.6× 33 256
Andrés Aradillas-López United States 9 182 2.0× 177 2.4× 165 2.5× 32 0.7× 18 0.6× 15 293
Thomas Tröger Germany 9 140 1.5× 158 2.1× 58 0.9× 70 1.4× 17 0.5× 19 245
Gábor Virág United States 10 108 1.2× 137 1.8× 100 1.5× 47 1.0× 19 0.6× 26 212
Juan Ortner United States 9 136 1.5× 124 1.7× 42 0.6× 50 1.0× 43 1.3× 26 200
Moritz Meyer-ter-Vehn United States 8 156 1.7× 212 2.8× 83 1.3× 88 1.8× 13 0.4× 17 265
Ichiro Obara United States 7 107 1.2× 133 1.8× 22 0.3× 60 1.2× 21 0.7× 18 187
Torben Stühmeier Germany 6 145 1.6× 25 0.3× 76 1.2× 26 0.5× 107 3.3× 12 222
Péter Eső United States 9 113 1.2× 191 2.5× 87 1.3× 80 1.6× 28 0.9× 18 262

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Blake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Blake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Blake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Blake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Blake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Blake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Blake. The network helps show where Thomas Blake may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Blake

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Blake. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Blake based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Blake. Thomas Blake is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Grabosky, Jason, et al.. (2025). Testing a Modified Pipe Model Approach to Predict Cross-Sectional Area of Tree Roots at Specific Distances from the Tree. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 51(1). 14–28.
2.
Backus, Matthew, et al.. (2025). Communication, Learning, and Bargaining Breakdown: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science.
3.
Backus, Matthew, et al.. (2021). Communication and Bargaining Breakdown. 129–129. 1 indexed citations
4.
Backus, Matthew, Thomas Blake, Dimitriy V. Masterov, & Steven Tadelis. (2021). Expectation, Disappointment, and Exit: Evidence on Reference Point Formation from an Online Marketplace. Journal of the European Economic Association. 20(1). 116–149. 7 indexed citations
5.
Backus, Matthew, et al.. (2020). Sequential Bargaining in the Field: Evidence from Millions of Online Bargaining Interactions*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 135(3). 1319–1361. 59 indexed citations
6.
Blake, Thomas, et al.. (2020). Communication and Bargaining Breakdown: An Empirical Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
7.
Backus, Matthew, Thomas Blake, & Steven Tadelis. (2018). On the Empirical Content of Cheap-Talk Signaling: An Application to Bargaining. Journal of Political Economy. 127(4). 1599–1628. 52 indexed citations
8.
Blake, Thomas. (2016). Commuting Costs and Geographic Sorting in the Housing Market. Real Estate Economics. 47(4). 1089–1118. 7 indexed citations
9.
Blake, Thomas, Chris Nosko, & Steven Tadelis. (2016). Returns to Consumer Search. 531–545. 10 indexed citations
10.
Blake, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Is Sniping A Problem For Online Auction Markets?. 88–96. 10 indexed citations
11.
Blake, Thomas & Dominic Coey. (2014). Why marketplace experimentation is harder than it seems. 567–582. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026