Thomas Beiert

1.6k citations
37 papers · 763 indexed · h-index 14

Thomas Beiert

36 papers receiving 757 citations

Peers

Thomas Beiert
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 476
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 185
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 47
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 90
  • Aging 6
Replace Gleb P. Tolstykh with:
Gleb P. Tolstykh United States
Thomas Desplantez Switzerland
Daniel Millard United States
Sara Nencini Australia
Kristen Springer United States
Jason E. Coleman United States
J. Molenaar Netherlands
Rudi Billeter United Kingdom
Jia Qin United States
Linda Volkers Netherlands
Thomas Beiert relative to Gleb P. Tolstykh United States Gleb P. Tolstykh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Gleb P. Tolstykh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Beiert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Beiert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Beiert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Beiert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Beiert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Beiert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Beiert. The network helps show where Thomas Beiert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Beiert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Beiert Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Beiert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20251
3 20241
4 20240
5 20241
6 20233
7 202227
8 20222
9 202119
10 20204
11 20193
12 201934
13 201818
14 201723
15 201724
16 201712
17 201722
18 20175
19 201616
20 2010340

About Thomas Beiert

Thomas Beiert is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Aging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Internal Medicine and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 37 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (11 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (8 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (476 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (185 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (47 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (90 citations) and Aging (6 citations). Thomas Beiert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Philipp Sasse, Tobias Bruegmann, Daniela Malan, Michael Hesse, Bernd K. Fleischmann, Jan W. Schrickel, Georg Nickenig, René Andrié, Florian Stöckigt and Markus Linhart. Their work appears in journals such as Cardiovascular Research, Clinical Research in Cardiology, Scientific Reports, International Journal of Cardiology and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026